Sun Tzu tells us that there are three ways that a ruler can bring misfortune upon his army. I want to discuss each one individually over the next three days.

The first:

By commanding the army to advance or to retreat, being ignorant of the fact that it cannot obey. This is called hobbling the army.

Now as I've said, most of us will not be commanding armies in the field any time soon. But this is relevant to us in a number of ways. Consider the following scenarios:

1. An inexperienced ceremonial magician invokes Jupiter to consecrate a wealth talisman while Jupiter is in Capricorn conjunct Saturn.

2. Upon getting involved in a fraternal lodge, a man agrees to a series of different commitments, despite the fact that he has a full time job and two kids at home. 

3. A woman is planning a fancy dinner party and so asks her husband to clean up the house, unaware of the fact that he has lodge meetings all day.

4. Having read the various posts about spiritual warfare I've done here, a reader attempts to fill his mind with some spiritual writing. Unfortunately, he picks Proclus's Elements of Theology, even though he has no background at all in Neoplatonic thought. Lacking the necessary background concepts and vocabulary to understand the text, he quickly becomes board and frustrated, and ends up spending 3 hours looking at Reddit.

I hasten to add that the second two examples do not come from personal experience.

All of this should call us back to the first chapter-- as is often going to be the case as we continue. Remember that among the factors which determine victory are the conditions of the Heavens and the Earth. Another factor is the general himself, and among the virtues necessary for him to cultivate is knowledge.

Whatever we mean to undertake, whether it's a magical operation, a work of self-transformation, or even cleaning the living room, knowledge will ensure our success, and a lack of knowledge will defeat us.

In this case, we need to know what our forces, however we are defining them, can and cannot do, both in general and in this particular moment.  I was just trying to clean up, and discovered that the vacuum cleaner's cord was too short to reach the other side of the room. If I order it to advance all day, it never will, until I get an extension cord. An army might be unable to advance because of a rainstorm, a mountain, or a larger enemy force in its path. All will halt its advance, but the proper method of response will be different in each case. The rainstorm will pass, the mountains can be avoided, the enemy force must be dealt with. 

In our spiritual war, it would be very good if we could simply put down our computers, or phones, or whatever you're reading this on, invoke a suitable deity and go out and exorcise the United States of America. Unfortunately, it does not work that way. The advantages of Heaven are with the Enemy right now, in the form of a powerfully malevolent Uranus traversing Taurus and making war upon Saturn. Much of the psychic ground in the world at large is held by enemy forces, and in many places we will be unable to advance. That's not a call to despair by any means: In its own way it's a huge advantage, as it gives us something to work against. But we must work against it effectively, and that means keeping in mind what we can do and where, when and how we can do it. 



Let's have some more Sun Tzu.

It is the rule in war, if our forces are ten to the enemy's one, to surround him; if five to one, to attack him; if twice as numerous, to divide our army in two.

If equally matched, we can offer battle; if slightly inferior in numbers, we can avoid the enemy; if quite unequal in every way, we can flee from him.

Hence, though an obstinate fight may be made by a small force, in the end it must be captured by the larger force.

I want to think about this passage especially in regard to the Spiritual Warfare we've been discussing.

Three thoughts come to mind:

1. Have you ever tried to engage with angry people on the internet? If so, how did it go? Have you ever told yourself "I'm just going to check the news real quick," and then found yourself an hour later having ingested a dozen different articles on any number of random topics, most of which left you feeling at once angry and powerless?

This is an example of a small force succumbing to a larger force. The Internet is bigger than you are, it is infested with demons, and most of the people on it are possessed or obsessed to one degree or another. 

2. Of course, the Internet isn't the only vector of demonic attack. These days, the astral environment generally is very bad. From what I can tell, it is much worse in the cities than in the countryside. That isn't an absolute rule, though. I've been in rural environments that were positively Lovecraftian in their overall feel. There does seem to be a difference though. Unwholesome places and spirits in the countryside, at least in my experience, feel like dangerous nature spirits. They're like sharks or mountain lions-- when  you're in their territory, you respect them, and try to stay out of their way. The things that travel from mind to mind via the internet feel much worse to me. 

On the other hand, what is the internet but a sub-natural environment held together by the enslavement of natural forces? Perhaps we should expect that its native spirits are of the unsavory kind. 

The point, though, is this: When we are on the enemy's ground, we are weak and outnumbered. But the same is true in reverse. Our first object in the Spiritual War should be to reconquer our own minds and our immediate psychic environment. And here there is a great deal that we can do, as we've discussed before. 

3. Ultimately, what we want to do is to outnumber the enemy. We can do this in a few ways. If we learn to master our own mind, and if we spend our mental energy on devotion, charitable work, and self-development-- the gods, the other, the self, to say it another way-- then we will, in time, be able to overwhelm the Enemy Within. Our immediate environments can also be reconquered with a bit of effort. Pick up the clutter in your room, vacuum the floor, and place some purifying herbs in a simmer pot on the stove, and the astral environment in your home will improve markedly.

There is much, though, that we simply cannot do. Many of our fellow citizens are something close to insane. Confront them, and you won't win-- the madness will spread to you. The only thing to do is to avoid them. "If unequal in every way, we can flee." 

Ultimately, as I wrote yesterday, we need to go beyond our own minds and personal spaces and network with others. Only in this way will we come to outnumber the Enemy-- at least some of the time.

More on this as we go along.


 Let's return to Sun Tzu, and to our discussion of the Spiritual Warfare.

Therefore the skillful leader subdues the enemy's troops without any fighting; he captures their cities without laying siege to them; he overthrows their kingdom without lengthy operations in the field. 

 
Now, our translator points out that the Chinese character 國, here being translated as "kingdom", refers especially to the government of a kingdom. In other words, the skillful leader overthrows the government without destroying the people. (The US strategy of regime change via "color revolution" is relevant here, though slightly off topic.)

As we have seen, the field of battle in the Spiritual Warfare is the soul, both the soul of the individual man and woman and the field of soul-stuff generally. And as we have also seen, at least a part of our souls-- all of our souls, I would guess-- is currently under the occupation of the Enemy. It is that part that we must reconquer-- if we are skillful, without strain or internal struggle; without lengthy operations in the field.

But how?

For assistance, let's turn to two other thinkers: the first is Plato; the second Bill Wilson, the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous.

At the beginning of The Republic, Plato tells us that the imaginary country he is describing is intended as an image of the soul. For, as Socrates says, the soul itself is too small to be seen; if we blow it up to the size of a kingdom, though, we can explore and understand it. And so Plato tells us that in the properly ordered kingdom, there will be three classes of people: the rulers, the soldiery, and the workers, all working together in harmony.

Now the rulers represent the reason and the divine part within us; the soldiers, the spirited part (call it the energy or the enthusiasm), and the workers the desires. In a properly ordered soul, the desires and passions will be subordinated to the rule of reason and divinity. The high-spirited part, the energy and enthusiasm, will support the goals of the reason and keep the passions in line. 

Now the rule of the demonic manifests in subordination to the passions

As we've discussed before, in the current world order, the primary vector for demonic attack is The Internet. And the Internet, especially social media, is deliberately designed to hijack to the brain and induce addictive behavior

And that's where Bill Wilson comes in.

In 1961, Wilson wrote to the psychologist Carl Jung what he called "a letter of great appreciation." 

The main subject of Wilson's letter was one of the early members of Alcoholics Anonymous, a one Roland H., who had previously been one of Jung's patients. Jung, however, had been unable to cure Mr. H of his addiction, and was forced to tell him that his case was probably hopeless. Wilson writes,

When he then asked you if there was any other hope, you told him that there might be, provided he could become the subject of a spiritual or religious experience—in short, a genuine conversion. You pointed out how such an experience, if brought about, might remotivate him when nothing else could. But you did caution, though, that while such experiences had sometimes brought recovery to alcoholics, they were, nevertheless, comparatively rare. You recommended that he place himself in a religious atmosphere and hope for the best.

Jung's response is extremely interesting:

 
His craving for alcohol was the equivalent, on a low level, of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with God.

Jung continues-- and this is worth quoting at length--

The only right and legitimate way to such an experience is that it happens to you in reality, and it can only happen to you when you walk on a path which leads you to higher understanding. You might be led to that goal by an act of grace or through a personal and honest contact with friends, or through a higher education of the mind beyond the confines of mere rationalism. I see from your letter that Roland H. has chosen the second way, which was, under the circumstances, obviously the best one.

I am strongly convinced that the evil principle prevailing in this world leads the unrecognized spiritual need into perdition if it is not counteracted either by real religious insight or by the protective wall of human community. An ordinary man, not protected by an action from above and isolated in society, cannot resist the power of evil, which is called very aptly the Devil. But the use of such words arouses so many mistakes that one can only keep aloof from them as much as possible.
 
You see, “alcohol” in Latin is spiritus, and you use the same word for the highest religious experience as well as for the most depraving poison. The helpful formula therefore is: spiritus contra spiritum.*
 

To put it in Plato's language:

A part of our internal kingdom-- a large part, or a small part, as may be-- is under the rule of the enemy. When we strain and struggle internally, we are opposing our enemy's armies. What we should rather do is overthrow the government of his kingdom. 

How do we do this?

By Spiritus contra spiritum. 

Twelve-step people use the language of "turning our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood him." We can use that language explicitly, or we can modify it a bit. In the language of Occultism, we might say "Turning our desires over to the rule of our Higher Self, custodian of our True Will, and our Holy Guardian Angel." And I'm sure you can think of other ways of saying the same thing. The point is that the forces of the higher planes must re-take the government of our souls, which are currently under the dominion of the demons of the Lower Astral Plane. 

But note the other major point that Jung makes: It's hard to do this alone. But we can have an honest religious experience through "a personal and honest contact with friends," and "the protective wall of human community." This is what recovery groups do for their members. Lacking a formal group, we can substitute for it by 1. rededicating our lives to our spiritual practices and 2. connecting with others on an informal basis. 

Is that enough? For many, it might be. If so, the next step might be to join or create something like "Screen Addicts Anonymous."

But I think we can do better than that. It seems to me that even the best recovery groups still have an aspect of struggle against the enemy's armies in the field, insofar as they continue to make addiction their focus

Last Summer, JMG fielded a discussion on his blog about the creation of a new Druid religious organization

From that conversation followed a flurry of development, which then stalled out for a time. Why did it stall? I'm uncertain, but I believe it was related to the badly afflicted condition of Jupiter, ruler of spirituality. Now the worst of that affliction has passed, and it's time to open the conversation back up. And that's what I plan on doing, starting today.



* "Spirit against spirit."





A brief note from Epictetus, on facing hard times:

To God you ought to swear such an oath as the soldiers do to Caesar. For they, in order to receive their pay, swear to prefer before all things the safety of Caesar; and will you not swear, who have received so many and so great favors; or, if you have sworn, will you not fulfil the oath? And what must you swear? Never to distrust, nor accuse, nor murmur at any of the things appointed by him; nor to shrink from doing or enduring that which is inevitable.
 

 Back to Sun Tzu tomorrow. Today, a brief but powerful bit of advice from that old master of the magical arts:

For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father also will forgive you;

but if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Forgiveness is not some empty moral platitude. Understood correctly, it's like the ultimate cheat-code to existence.

Consider:

Whatever you do will return to you, no matter what.

If you spend your time blessing others and doing charitable works, you will receive blessing and charity in return.

If you spend your time cursing others and doing hateful deeds, you will receive cursing and hate in return.

But what if you spend part of life time cursing, and then realize the error of your ways, and try to change things?

Well, you're still going to have to deal with the consequences of your earlier actions, and that's probably going to suck quite a bit...

Unless you have a way out. 

And that's where forgiveness comes in. What you do will return to you; what you sew, you will reap. Sew barley, reap barley; sew brambles, reap brambles. 

Sew forgiveness, and receive forgiveness. 

When you forgive others, you release them from their debt to you. (You also free up a great deal of psychic energy that was locked up in staying mad at them, but that's a different topic.) At the same moment and by the same means, you are released from your own debts. 

Couldn't this be abused? Couldn't you go out and do some monstrous crime, and then ensure you get away with it by forgiving someone who hurt you?

Well, let's think about that. If we reap as we sew; and we sew forgiveness only in an attempt to get away from a crime, what is it that we will reap?

Epictetus tells us,

Remember never to say that you are alone; for you are not alone, but God is within, and your genius is within; and what need have they of light to see what you are doing?
 I want to talk a little more about walled cities. Sun Tzu says,

The rule is, not to besiege walled cities if it can possibly be avoided.

I call this the "Don't attack Minas Tirith" rule.

On the off chance that anyone doesn't know what that refers to, let me explain.

In the Lord of the Rings, Minas Tirith is the capital city of the human kingdom of Gondor. It's a beautiful, ancient city, and it's the supreme symbol of resistance to the Dark Lord, Sauron. For that reason, Sauron wants to destroy it. The only trouble is that Minas Tirith is also a nearly impregnable fortress. It's carved out of a mountainside and defended by seven rings of walls. Nevertheless, Sauron decides, as his opening move in the War of the Ring, to launch an enormous frontal assault on Minas Tirith. Of course, the defenders are able to hold out just long enough for reinforcements to arrived, and in the end Sauron's armies are caught between a cavalry force arriving from the west and an army of defenders arriving from the south and destroyed.

Gandalf and Aragorn, the leaders of the good guys, have clearly read Sun Tzu; Sauron has not. In Catholic moral theology, sin and evil are said to make you stupid, and maybe that's what Tolkien was thinking. Either way, let's talk about what this means for us.

First, why does Sauron want Minas Tirith? His armies are made up of orcs and trolls, who live in caves; Nazgul, who are dead; and allies from the East and South, who have their own homelands. It's not clear that any of them would need or want to live in the city of Minas Tirith in the first place. The appeal of Minas Tirith is entirely symbolic. To its defenders, it symbolizes hope and resistance; to Sauron, his past failures. So what it comes down to is: Sauron wants it because everyone else wants it. 

Second, if he does want Minas Tirith, what does he gain from attacking it head on? His armies greatly outnumber those of his foes. He could have left a small force to keep the Gondormen bottled up in their city while the rest of his armies conquered the rest of the country. At that point all he would have to do is wait. Eventually the defenders would give up Minas Tirith voluntarily.

Now I'd like to suggest that this example can be applied to almost any situation.

Let's say you want a romantic partner. Well, who do you want?

"This girl, who looks like my favorite movie actress, is the only one who will do."

Are you sure? 

"Yes. Out of all four billion women in the world, she is the only one for me; without her, I will die. Therefore I mean to ply her with entreaties, gifts and favors, in the hope that she will maybe some day finally take an interest in me. Maybe when she breaks up with that jerk she's always dating. Or maybe if she's drunk."

A lot of young men take this approach to dating. Of course, this approach always fails. Most guys eventually figure out that this isn't the way. Apparently, though, some never do, and there is a whole internet subculture of young men who call themselves "incels," for "involuntarily celibate." A lot of them then spend their time lashing out at women, modern culture, and everything in between-- anything to avoid taking responsibility for their own failures. 

The problem, of course, is that they opened by attacking Minas Tirith. 

If you decide that one, and only one, girl (or guy) is the one for you, you are setting yourself up for failure. And this is doubly, triply, quintuply true if the Only One For You just happens to be the type that everyone else wants, too. 

If you really want a partner, then, there are two things to do.

First, be clear to yourself about what you actually want. Do you really want someone who looks like the women in the movies, or is that just what you've been told to want? I think for a lot of people it's the latter. Certainly that's true in my case. I've been with a lot of different types of women and I've found that the skinny, featureless ones simply do not appeal to me in any way. While I'm not a fan of the Rubenesque, I'll take Boticelli's Venus over Emaciated Hollywood Starlet any day of the week. 

So clarifying what you want is extremely important-- as we keep saying.

But what if it turns out you do like the conventionally attractive? What if your ideal of feminine beauty is Scarlet Johannsen, and you quite simply can't get turned on by anything else? Is all lost?

Of course not.

The thing is, at the end of the day, every country has its capital city, even if it's not as heavily defended as Minas Tirith. Whatever person you do want to be with, whatever they look like, is Minas Tirith for you. 

And the easiest way to take the capital city is still to get the defenders to surrender it voluntarily. Instead of pursuing the object of your affection, get her (or him) to pursue you.

How do you do that?

By working on yourself. If a young man came to me for dating advice, I'd recommend the following:

1. Take up some form of spiritual practice. I don't care what, but make sure it appeals to you and that it has a strong practical component. If you're going to become a Buddhist, meditate every day; if a Catholic, say your prayers; if a Hindu, do your puja (or whatever). 

2. Learn a craft or art. Again, it doesn't matter what. Become a painter, a brewer, or a mushroom forager, as long as it's something you care about. 

3. Take up some kind of physical exercise. This one will also be different for everyone, depending on body type. I love martial arts, like running, and hate weight lifting. You might be the opposite. 

To the extent that you can, get involved with others who share your interests, whether offline (preferable) or online (okay). That shouldn't be the focus, though; the focus is to build up yourself.

4. To the extent that it's necessary, learn basic grooming, social, and financial skills. We can't all be fashion models, but we can all comb our hair and wear a shirt that fits. We can't all be master wits or players, but we can all learn the basics of reading body language. We can't all be millionaires, but we can all manage our money well enough that we're not living paycheck to paycheck.

For a year, just do these things, without pursuing any romantic partner. I promise that at the end of that time, you will have your choice of women. The gates of the city will be opened to you.

(Would this advice work for a young woman? I don't know, having never been one. I suspect so, though, as if I were single, I'd happily date a woman that followed it!)

So that's just one area of life. But Sun Tzu's advice is applicable to many others as well.

The last time I submitted a piece of fiction to a professional market it came back with a polite rejection. Later I found out that, during the brief window in which the editors were accepting submissions, they received 8,000 stories.

It's hard to think of a better example of besieging a walled city than that. Even if you're better than 99% of the competition, you've still got 80 competing stories, and they've only got room for 4. At that point, it's luck of the draw. 

On the other hand, the most recent piece of fiction I wrote was greatly loved by its audience. Every year at Christmas, I write my stepson a little chapter book about his cats and their adventures. He loves them, I love writing them, and the annual reading of the Cat Book has become a family tradition. John Adams wrote that an aristocrat is anyone who can command two votes-- his own and one other. By the same token, an author is anyone whose stories are read by two people-- himself, and one other. 

Eventually I'll get around to publishing fiction in "professional" markets, but when I do, they're going to come to me. 

To pick a more brutal example, people who get into fistfights without much training or experience typically pick the wrong targets. Fighters on TV shows hit their opponents in the face with a big right hook, and their opponents dutifully respond by getting "knocked out" and falling to the ground.

In a real fight, this is the equivalent of the frontal assault on Minas Tirith. If you're much bigger, stronger, and faster than your opponent, it might work-- though that raises the question of what you're doing in a fight that unfair. A kick to the groin might be much less glamorous than a right hook to the jaw, but it works much better, I promise.

(Best of all, of course, is to be the kind of person who has sufficient training that would-be assailants leave you alone in the first place.)

Well, this post has gone on at some length, and I think I've made my point. See you tomorrow, everybody!
 Sun Tzu tells us about the best and worst ways to win a war:

The highest form of generalship is to baulk the enemy's plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy's forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy's army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.

Let's look at the last of Sun Tzu's forms of generalship, and then contrast it with the first. 

First, the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities. 

Let's suppose that, for any given goal we might pursue, we have an enemy, whose only objective is to stop us from achieving that goal. All the obstacles that we might face, whether they consist of other people, time or circumstances, are all agents of that one enemy.

If that's the case, then walled cities are those places where the enemy is strongest. 

If you're trying to become a writer, this probably looks like starting out by writing an 800-page fantasy novel and sending it off to one of the Big 3 publishers. Sure, there's a small chance you'll get somewhere with it, but-- well, you won't. 

If you want to change peoples' minds about politics, this looks like walking into one of the Other Side's internet forums and starting an argument about how they're all wrong about everything. 

Actually, if you want to change anyone's mind about something, starting off by telling them they're definitely both evil and stupid for believing as they do is the quickest way to get them to hide behind the mental equivalent of city walls.

With respect to the spiritual war, any place or time where the Enemy is strong can be thought of as a walled city. The internet in general and social media in particular should be thought of as Enemy fortresses. If you spend time on these things, avoid conflict. Even if you win, you will lose. 

Now, the very best policy is to baulk the enemy's plans. On this subject our translator, Lionel Giles, appends the following note:

Perhaps the word "baulk" falls short of expressing the full force of [Chinese character], which implies not an attitude of defense, whereby one might be content to foil the enemy's stratagems one after another, but an active policy of counter-attack. Ho Shih puts this very clearly in his note: "When the enemy has made a plan of attack against us, we must anticipate him by delivering our own attack first.

This recalls Sun Tzu's earlier injunction to swiftness. While, as he tells us in Chapter 1, the general who makes many calculations before battle will be victorious, nevertheless, "cleverness has never been associated with long delays" and "there is no instance of a country having benefited by protracted warfare.

All of this suggests the following.

When we begin to undertake any task, we should consider beforehand what the obstacles might be. Of course, that requires, as always, that we define our goals. If you are writing a novel, is your goal simply to tell the story you want to tell? Or is it to publish it and share it with readers? Or do you want to write a best-seller? 

Whatever the case, your approach is going to be different, and your opponents will be different. 

Most writers struggle with 1. finding time to write and 2. actually writing when they do have the time. You can plan for this beforehand in a few ways. One very good one is to learn how to train your will in general, so that it becomes easy to develop a habit when you need it. John Michael Greer had a series of posts on this a few months back, which I personally found very helpful. If you've developed the capacity for habitual action (call this training and discipline), then you can create a writing habit and make it stick before the enemies forces of Excuses, Distractions, Writer's Block, I Don't Have Time, Let's Make Another Pot of Coffee and so on ever have a chance to get moving against you. You can schedule and see where you can free up an hour every day.

The same lesson can be applied to the spiritual life and spiritual warfare.

If you spend time developing your relationship with the divine, practicing virtue and charity, cultivating your will, and building relationships with others who can help you when you are struggling, you will be in a much better position to withstand the assaults of the Enemy. But really, it's better than that-- The Enemy will flee from you. In China, they used to send Taoist adepts to go and set up hermitages in mountains that were known to be habitations of demons. The mere presence of the hermit calms the restless spirit. You may have encountered a person like this-- the kind that seems to carry an atmosphere of serenity with them. That's the sort of atmosphere we all want to cultivate. 

There's another, more direct way to intercept the Enemy before he can make a move. 

I once listened to a Tibetan Buddhist monk complain about people who came to him because they were under magical attack. He wasn't complaining that the people were wrong or that curses aren't real or any such thing. No, he was making the point that curses would not impact people if they didn't have bad karma. "Look at the Dalai Lama. Do you think people can do magic to the Dalai Lama? Of course not." 

The repentance of sins and the forgiveness of enemies might sound like bland moral platitudes. This isn't true: They are actually powerful, practical acts of magic. 

This is why recovery programs like AA emphasize making amends for past wrongs. What happens in that case is this: A number of people hate the addict or alcoholic, and often for good reason. Because we are never psychically separate-- and people who are prone to addiction are typically more psychically sensitive than most-- the addict feels the hatred of their enemies as a curse. Meanwhile, their own ongoing misdeeds create a kind of gap in the aura through which curses can enter and cause them harm. Making amends attacks this in two ways: First, it replaces the bad behavior which creates the gap in the aura. Second, it reduces or eliminates the thoughts of hurt, anger and resentment that regularly come the addict's way, and to which they habitually respond with drug or drunk. Finally, by building up new habits of charity and responsibility, the recovering addict intercepts new curses before they ever happen. 

Sun Tzu's other two ways can be seen as intermeidate between baulking the enemy's plans and besieging walled cities-- and, of course, we're really talking about a spectrum, not four discrete possibilities. It's worth reflecting, in all our doings, on what looks like attacking a city, and what looks like taking open ground before the enemy can muster!
A new administration takes power in America today. The astrological conditions for the event are almost comically terrible; JMG posted his analysis a few weeks back and later today or tomorrow I'm going to post my own writeup over at Vox Caelorum. Astral conditions are as bad as they've ever been in my lifetime, and a clairvoyant friend who is old enough to remember 1968 says that they are worse than she's ever seen them.

Sounds like a good day to discuss the spiritual warfare, with the aid of our old friends Sun Tzu and Eliphas Levi.

Sun Tzu tells us:

In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to capture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.

Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.

The territory on which our war is being fought is the soul. We will understand what that means better if we remember that "soul" is the English translation of the Latin word "anima" and the Greek word "psyche." Anima is the root of "animate," meaning "that which moves." "Psyche," of course, is identical to "mind," and consists of all of the contents of our minds. And so we could define "soul" as "the total contents of our minds and our actions."

Let's turn to Levi for a moment:

And now the nature of the conflict clearly presents itself:

Part of our souls lie under the dominion of the Enemy.

Which parts?

For the specific purpose of this discussion, the Enemy is the demonic power which is driving people in the United States and around the world into a frenzy of rage over political issues. It first manifested itself in the deranged reaction to the election of Donald Trump and the successful Brexit referendum by members of the liberal classes in the United States and the United Kingdom. But it is active on the political Right as well, and has now exploded into full force among certain Trump supporters in their reaction to his electoral defeat.

Expect it to continue to evolve and mutate and to take many forms in the years ahead. It will change its story and its appearance, but you can always tell that it's there. Watch for the following signs: Excess emotion, especially rage; willing indulgence in fantasies of violence, which then become acts of violence; a complete lack of reflective thought. If you are sensitive to these things, you can feel its presence in a tightening in your various energy centers, as though someone were squeezing your throat or punching you in the solar plexus. You can see it in others in the glazed looks in their eyes and the incoherent justifications they give for violent actions.

Our goal, let us remember, is to live in peace. This doesn't necessarily mean an absence of physical violence. It means the subordination of all of our actions and all the contents of our minds to our spirits, our wills, and our gods. 

Let's turn back to Sun Tzu, then, with this in mind.

Our goal is to "take the enemy's country intact," not to "shatter and destroy it." What does that mean in the war for our souls?

Two things come to mind.

First, we want to be live in such a way that peace, as I've defined it, comes naturally. If we're spending time straining and struggling within ourselves, we're both suffering and wasting a ton of energy. The classic example of this, of course, is the devout and scrupulous Catholic who is trying to avoid "sexual sin" by a constant internal struggle. The result is a person who feels blocked up, constipated, and irritable, and is unable to get very much done because of all the energy they're spending trying not to think about masturbating. Even if they "win," they've done so at great cost, and have certainly "shattered and destroyed" much of the country of their own souls.

"What you resist you strengthen." Don't fight the demons and the passions by resisting them. Instead, as I've suggested before, simply do other things with your time. Things which matter and have meaning to you. Above all else, pray, meditate, and engage in spiritual practice. If you feel "tempted," don't fight against it-- use the energy to do something good with your time. 

Now let's turn to Levi, because I want to add another piece that we haven't discussed before:
 
Magnetic respiration produces a radiation around the soul of which it is the center, and it surrounds itself with the reflection of its works, which makes a Heaven or a Hell for itself. There are no solitary acts and there can be no hidden acts; all that we truly want, that is to say all of which we confirm by our acts, remains written in the astral light, where our reflections are kept; these reflections continually influence our thoughts through the mediation of the diaphane, and it is thus that we become and remain the child of our own works.
 
Our souls are not isolated units, and don't exist in a vacuum. They are more like whirlpools of astral substance. You can define the boundary between the whirlpool and the river, but both are made of the same water. It's not enough to act in isolation and pursue personal fulfillment. We have to do some work to purify the waters around us.

And how do we do that?

Let me allow another one of the great ancient masters of magic to answer that.

You have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thy enemy. But I say to you, Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you: That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust. 46For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this? And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this? 48Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.

Today, and every day, pray for your enemies. If, like me, you're not a fan of Joe Biden or his party, today is a good day to pray for them. Don't pray that Biden will become a Republican, a Populist, a Socialist or whatever you wish he was; just pray that he will be blessed by God and guided in the presidency. If you're Christian, a candle for the guardian angel of the United States, and the Virgin Mary as patron saint of America under her title of Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception would be appropriate, and doubly so since Biden is at least nominally Catholic. If pagan, an offering to Jupiter would accomplish the same thing. 

And while you're out in the world, spend your time blessing people. This is especially easy to do when you're driving, for two reasons: 1. you will encounter a lot of people and 2. most of them will make you angry. Use the energy of the guy that just cut you off to send a blessing his way, and honestly mean it. A simple "May you be blessed," is enough, if you can say it and mean it.

Finally, in addition to prayers, this is a good time to make offerings. (Actually, there's never a bad time.) If you follow the planetary deities, you can synchronize your offerings with the days of the week; Chris Warnock has details here. But you can always pick a cause you care about, invoke your God, and make a donation in their name. In this way you will increase the amount of good in the world. It will return to you, but you must do it without expectation of reward. Do good and allow yourself to love the Good for its own sake.

In these ways, we can begin to reconquer our own souls, and the Soul of the World around us.
 Today, another note from Eliphas Levi:

There is a respiration of the soul, exactly like that of the body. It inhales what it believes to be happiness, and exhales the ideas that result from its inner sensations. Diseased souls have an evil breath and vitiate their moral atmosphere-- that is, they combine impure reflections with the Astral Light which permeates them and establish unwholesome currents therein. We are often surprised when we are assailed, in public, by bad thoughts which we would not have thought possible of ourselves, and we do not realize that they are due to some unhealthy person nearby. This is a secret of great importance, for it leads to the manifestation of the conscience, one of the most incontestable and terrible powers of the art of magic. 

Most of you are already familiar with this idea, but it bears reiterating. Not all of our thoughts-- in fact, I would argue, very, very few of our thoughts-- are our own. Thoughts have their own lives, and they leap from mind to mind, animated under their own power and influencing the behavior of all those they contact.

It is worth noting that this is exactly the idea of the meme, as originally formulated by Richard Dawkins-- no friend of occultists! The only difference is that a materialist would say something like "A meme is a self-replicating unit of culture which is spread from brain to brain by imitation," and would deny that there could be a transmission of memes without some direct physical contact. And actually, that point of dispute is both very old and academic-- the same issue was being debated by Thomists and Franciscans 700 years ago, and by the followers of Aristotle and Plato a thousand years before that! 

To my mind, it's important to note that transmission of mental "substance" can occur without any obvious physical contact; simply being in the same space as what Levi calls a "diseased soul" is enough to do the job. But you can follow along with this discussion even if you're a materialist or a Thomist who doesn't believe in such things. 

Levi concludes this paragraph by telling us that this is the idea that leads to "the manifestation of conscience," which is "one of the most terrible powers of the art of magic." What could he possibly mean? Tomorrow I want to return to Sun Tzu to explore that idea with regard to the ongoing spiritual warfare, and begin to raise the question-- How can we take the fight to the enemy?

One last note from Chapter 2 of The Art of War.  Sun Tzu concludes:

In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns.
 
This might sound simple and obvious, but it is a call back to a theme that I want to keep repeating through all of these posts. What is your goal? When you undertake any particular thing, why are you doing it, and what do you hope to achieve?

This is especially the case when we enter into any kind of conflict, whether it's a political debate, an argument with a salesperson or a dispute with our spouse. Very often, interpersonal conflict is not honest and arguments between two people are not actually about what they are supposedly about. They are, instead, social games. 

In Games People Play, Eric Berne described a social game as:

an ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions progressing to a well-defined, predictable outcome. Desccriptively it is a recurring set of transactions, often repetitious, superficially plausible, with a concealed motivation; or, more colloquially, a series of moves with a snare, or "gimmick."

Berne then describes, as a typical example, a game called "If It Weren't For You." You've probably seen this game before. Maybe you've even played it yourself, without realizing it. (I have.) 

In "If It Weren't For You," one member of a partnership (whether a marital relationship or not) discovers that there are many things they could have done in their lives if only the other member of the partnership hadn't held them back. Of course, the person does not actually want to do these things, because they are too afraid to. By playing If It Weren't For You, they're able to both not do the things that scare them and, often enough, to guilt trip the other party into doing things for them. "If it weren't for you," she tells him, "I'd have left this crummy town years ago!" And he feels terrible about this, and so buys her the new dress that she wants. "If it weren't for this job, I'd have fulfilled my childhood dream of traveling around Canada!" he tells himself. But he'd never go to Canada; he's too afraid of moose. By Playing If IT Weren't For You, he gets what he wants and he gets sympathy from others when he complains about it over drinks at night.  

When we enter into any conflict, then, let us first make sure we're clear about what we want, and what it would be like if we were to get it. Let our object be victory, not lengthy campaigns; honest desires, not social games.
Today, more from Sun Tzu

Bring war material with you from home, but forage on the enemy. Thus the army will have food enough for its needs.

Forage on the enemy. That is, an army should take what it needs from its enemy's store, rather than depleting its own country's resources.

How can we apply this idea to our lives in general, and to the Spiritual Warfare we've been discussing?

Let's take the second question first. When I feel pulled to look at political or news websites or to dwell on the horrifying state of our politics or to let myself spiral into emotion about these things, it feels like a psychic attack, and I think we should see it that way. 

I wrote yesterday that the battleground in all of this is our own psyches. We aren't invading Demon Land to conquer-- although we can and should talk about what that might look like, too. One thing at a time, though. For now, we're fighting for our own minds. How can we use the enemy's strength to augment our own?

Yesterday I suggested tactics for dealing with psychic attack. Pray and meditate. Banish. Burn frankincense or benzoin, or their essential oils in a simmer-pot. Go outside and walk in the woods. Do something important to you. And I'm sure you can think of more.

Today I'd like to re-emphasize this, but from a different point of view. Don't just view these things as responses to a psychic attack. Let the attack provide you with the energy to do these things. Later on, Sun Tzu will talk about seizing the enemy's chariots and giving them to your own soldiers. Look at it that way. So your Social Justice Warrior sister-in-law just texted you some Facebook meme about white privilege. Great! Don't respond. Take the irritation that it provoked in you and use the energy to get yourself to take a walk in the woods or work on your novel. Or take the opportunity to pray and sit for a little while in meditation. Pray for your sister-in-law. Don't pray that she give up her stupid ideas. Just pray that God, or her god, will look after her, and that you can forgive her for being who and what she is. Be grateful for the chance to practice forgiveness. The time spent in prayer will improve you in every way, and if not for her, you never would have done it. 

Taking this approach, it's easy to see how we can apply this strategy to other goals in our lives. Is it taking forever to finish your novel? Great. Don't bewail your fate, allow it to inspire you. Accept that you'll be at it for a while, and that every day you spend writing and re-writing just makes you a better writer. Are you trying to find a new job? Let the process of sending out resumes and going to interviews teach you things-- and not just how to write resumes or interviews. Go into an interview with the intention that even if you don't get the job, you're going to gain by learning by how people in this industry think, how they talk, and what they want. Forage on the enemy-- grow from the process, whatever it is. 



There are really just two ways to win a fight. Method 1: Hit the other guy before he can hit you. Method 2: Let him try to hit you first; use his energy against him. 



This is Method 2. What about Method 1? We'll talk about that tomorrow. 
Let's look at The Art of War, Chapter 2.

Sun Tzu tells us:

When engaged in actual fighting, if victory is long in coming, the men's weapons will grow dull and their ardor will be damped. If you lay siege to a town, you will exhaust your strength.

Again, if the campaign is protracted, the resources of the State will not be equal to the strain.

Now, when your weapons are dulled, your ardor damped, your strength exhausted and your treasure spent, other chieftains will spring up to take advantage. Then no man, however wise, will be able to avert the consequences that must ensue.

Thus, though we have heard of stupid haste in war, cleverness has never been associated with long delays.

There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare.


Sun Tzu is certainly right that countries do not benefit from prolonged warfare. But it is worth noting that one side will invariably have the ability to prolong a war beyond that of their opponent, and that is the side that is going to win. This is why the North Vietnamese won the Vietnam War despite superior American firepower, and why the Taliban will ultimately win in Afghanistan.

How can we apply Sun Tzu's points both to (1) our personal goals and to (2) the spiritual warfare that we have been discussing?

I'd like to suggest the following for consideration.

(1) If you want to accomplish anything at all, persistence is critical. If you want to write a novel, the novel is your goal, and an unwritten novel is your enemy. (How many half-finished novels do you have stored on your computers, writers? I know I've got at least a half dozen.) The Enemy will use every device to outlast you, to damp your ardor and exhaust your strength. But every day that you outlast him, you weaken him and strengthen yourself.

On the other hand, when it comes time to publish your book, haste-- though not stupid haste-- is preferably to a long delay. A Christmas recipe book will not sell very well if its release is delayed until February.

Perhaps we should break our goals down into two types: Those that resemble training, and those that resemble combat. In those that resemble training, discipline, patience, and persistence are key. The head of the tai chi lineage that I've been training in for a number of years recently accepted me as an instructor. I was able to get to that point thanks to daily practice over the course of seven years. When I started, I was terrible, and I couldn't make it through a form without hurting myself. On the other hand, when I start teaching public classes, swiftness is preferably to delay. Hemming and hawing won't bring in any students! 

(2) Applying these thoughts to the spiritual war, how can we make use of them?

One way to think of the ongoing crisis is as a build up of energy in the Lower Astral Plane. This happens from time to time. It dissipates when the pressures in the Lower Astral are discharged into the Physical Plane. Unfortunately, that discharge is never pretty; it takes the form of war, death, natural disaster, conflict, plague and so on. We're clearly in the middle of that phase right now.

Outlast the enemy. Demons may be smart, but Patience is a virtue, not a passion. When you find yourself pulled into the conflict, give the enemy nothing. Pray. Do a banishing ritual. Go outside. Work on something truly important to you-- something that expresses the highest part of yourself, not the lowest. Do it every time. And do it quickly. Don't linger over your anger; do something else right now. If whatever triggered it is actually important, you can come back to it later, when you are calm; chances are it isn't, though.

Remember that your psyche is your territory; the Enemy is an invader. Outlast him, and give him nothing that will feed him, and he will be forced to retreat in dismay.

Hi Everyone,

I'm out of town and won't be able to respond to comments for a couple of days. Let's have an extra post for 1.15.

Sun Tzu concludes Chapter 1:

Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.


This point seems critical to our ongoing conversation.

We've been discussing acting from the will, not the passions. Something that I only recently realized is that the word "passion" bears the same relationship to "passive" that "action" does to "active." If you are acting from your passions-- rage and fear in particular, in this case-- you aren't really acting at all. You're being acted upon!
In the comments, we've been discussing Sun Tzu's ideas in light of political and astral conditions here in the US. Chapter 1 of the Art of War closes with some more advice on the use of deception in warfare. I want to share some of these, and suggest a way of applying them to our present situation.

All warfare is based on deception.

Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.

If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is superior in strength, evade him.

If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.

If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them.

Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.

These military devices, leading to victory, must not be divulged beforehand.
 
Let us assume that we are in a war-- a spiritual war. The enemy is a plague of demons. You can take this as a metaphor, if you prefer. In that case, the "demons" are metaphors for toxic memes, collective insanity, political cults and the madness of crowds. It works either way. What do they want? Demons are characterized by intense emotion, particularly wrath and hate, intense desire, and an absence of reflection.

When people abandon their reasoning faculties and lash out at one another like animals, they are possessed by demons. (Again, this can be a metaphor, if you like.) This is the demons' goal; it feeds them. Mob violence, dehumanization, fear and paranoia, terrorism and conflict all feed them. What they want is to feed; when you give in to them, they feed on you. That's what they want, and that's how they win.

What do we want? Many things, but they can be boiled down to: "To live in peace." To live in peace doesn't refer to Pacifism. I am a martial artist and not a Pacifist. It refers, rather, but rather to a state of consciousness in which our spirits, rather than our passions, are in control of our faculties, and the same can be said for the people that we spend our time around. We don't need to worry about flying into a frenzy of rage or terror, and we also don't need to worry about people being provoked into rage and terror by images they see in the glass screens that are gates to Hell. 

Let's assume all of these things, and then one thing more. Let's assume that even though they can't reason or reflect, the demons are smart. They are older than we are, and they got here ahead of us. They're smart enough to know strategic thinking, and to apply it against us. 

If so, they are already making use of all of the foregoing points of advice from Sun Tzu. 

If that is the case, how does that modify your response to the situation? 

"Hold out baits to entice the enemy." Has anyone-- or rather, anything-- ever done that to you, on the television news or social media? "If he is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him." This goes back to the discussion of Seneca's De Irae. Anger is a poor general, and will always lead you badly. "Give him no rest." Does your phone give you a chance to rest? Does the 24-hour news cycle?

Right now the enemy is superior in strength. We would do well to evade him. 
Hi Everyone,

I've started a second Dreamwidth specifically to discuss astrology. I call it Vox Caelorum. I've just put the first post up-- an interpretation of yesterday's New Moon. (Yes, a day late... good intentions, you know.) See you there! 
 Back to Sun Tzu.

The first chapter of The Art of War closes with several pieces of warfighting advice. One that I want to highlight is this:

All warfare is based on deception.

Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. 
 
How can we apply this advice to our lives at this time?

Most of the time, most of us aren't going into battle. The average, day-to-day goals that we are trying to accomplish don't require "deception," as such. What they do often call for, which is similar to deception, is silence.

Some goals can be achieved no matter how much you talk about them. This morning my wife and I planned what to have for dinner tonight; in an hour or two I'll get it started. Simple enough. 

But other types of goals benefit enormously from simply not talking about them while you're pursuing them.

I've talked about writing a few times in these posts. Writing is very much one of these kinds of goals. If you want to take all the energy out of a writing project, especially if it's a fiction project, talk about it before it's finished. 

Some people are exceptions to this. Mario Puzo's son recalled that while his father was writing The Godfather he used to shout at his kids "Be quiet, I'm writing a bestseller!" And he was right. But I'm not Mario Puzo and you probably aren't either.

Other types goals are like this. If you have a New Years resolution to hit the gym every day, just do it. Don't tell anyone about it. The more people you tell, the more likely you are to miss a day, and then to decide that since you missed yesterday, you might as well miss today, and tomorrow, too. 

How to know which goals to shut up about? Well, you could play it safe and just not talk about any of them if you don't need to. This is usually what I do. I talk about my plans with people they directly concern, and that's about it. . 

So that's how deception applies to everyday, non-warfighting types of goals.

On the other hand, related to what I posted yesterday, everyday life is feeling more and more like a battle. Political conditions and their reflection in the Astral Light are becoming increasingly toxic in the United States. If your goal is to join one or the other of the two sides lining up against one another right now, I'm sure you can figure out how to apply Sun Tzu's words on your own. On the other hand, if your goal is to weather the storm and to still be here once the demons of the Left and Right are done with one another, I want to talk about how we can apply Sun Tzu's advice.

All warfare is based on deception. Our war is the war of the spirit against the passions, God against the Devil, reason against emotion, peace against war. How do we deceive our enemy?

I suspect that silence is the key here, as well. In particular, there is no reason to engage in political arguments or discussions with those who are committed to one side of our political divide or the other. In certain situations, you may feel that you are forced to do so. Are you really, though? What is your motive? 

We do not know where things are going. Everything could calm down after the Inauguration or we could be in a civil war by the summer. Right now, there is absolutely nothing to be gained by standing out, making noise, or rushing to judgment. Above all, avoid committed partisans. You can't reason with them right now; all you can do is have them label you "Enemy." 

Beyond that, we just don't know yet. More will become clear with time.  


We'll return to Sun Tzu tomorrow. Today I want to check in with our old friend, 19th century occultist Eliphas Levi. 

In Chapter 6 of Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic, Levi discusses the nature of the Astral Light. The Astral Light is his term for the total collection of shared images, feelings, and impulses which act upon us as individuals and as a society. Whether or not the Astral Light "really exists" is totally immaterial to what follows. 

Levi writes:

People who renounce the empire of reason and who love losing their will in the pursuit of reflections of the astral light are subject to alternative bouts of furor and sorrow which remind us of all the wonders of demonic possession.

Does that remind you of anyone?

If you've been watching the news for the last.... ever, it should.

But now I'm talking about other people. 

I've noticed that, when I let my mind think about the news, or about politics, it does the following. First, it conjures up an image of someone on the Other Side. When I was younger and liberal, this was a conservative; now that I'm older and conservative, it's a liberal. Then it sets the image into motion; like an idiotic puppet, it repeats whatever the Other Side's propaganda line of the day is.

Freedom! 9/11! 'Murica! You're with us or with the terrorists! God, guns, and guts! Terrorists, terrorists everywhere!

Racist! Sexist! White privilege! Anything I don't like is Hitler! Russians, Russians everywhere!

I then respond by becoming angrier and angrier. Sometimes-- not always, but often enough-- may God forgive me-- I find a real-life person who reminds me just a little too much of the image in my mind, and I lash out at them. I'm always thinking that telling people how dumb they are will convert them to my cause. Somehow, it keeps never working.

This, of course, is precisely what Levi is talking about. The cartoon caricature of the Other Side is an image, reflected in the Astral Light. There are many, many such reflections, and when our minds are left to their own devices, they are led about by them like a dog on a leash. 

The Astral Light directs the animal instincts and battles against man's intelligence, which it tends to pervert through the lavishness of its reflections and the lies of its images...
 

The Astral Light-- the ideas and images that we live with-- the memes that compose our culture from moment to moment, if you like-- are always present. So what can we do to free ourself of its domination?

Levi is clear:

To isolate oneself from the Astral Light, it does not suffice to wrap oneself in woolen material; one must also, and most importantly, have achieved an absolute tranquility of the mind and heart; have left the domain of the passions; and have made sure of one's ability to keep an inflexible will while acting sincerely. One must also repeat these acts of will often, because... the will is secured only through acts, just like religions have no power or duration over time except through their ceremonies and their rites.
 
Meditation, prayer, and spiritual practice are the only methods I know for achieving this. At times like these, when the Astral Light is filled with maddening reflections driving the most ordinary people to violence, spiritual practice is especially important. Pick a God, any God-- just pick God, or the Devil will surely pick you. 



Over at her blog, my friend Violet has some very good suggestions in this regard.




Sun Tzu continues:

Therefore, in your deliberations, when seeking to determine the military conditions, let them be made the basis of a comparison, in this wise:

He then gives us seven questions for comparison. I want to take a few at a time. The first is:

1. Which of the two sovereigns is imbued with the Moral Law?

To which our translator appends the note:

I.e., which ruler is in harmony with his subjects?
 
2. Which of the two generals has most ability?
 
All of these considerations apply whether or not there is any known competition for your goal-- although there often is. If you are applying for a job at a bank, the bank is the terrain of battle, the job the goal, and your competitors for the job the opposing sovereign. The job description and required qualifications are the Tao or Moral Law for this scenario. Your skills at managing an interview are your abilities as a general. Both are critical factors; if you are qualified, but come across as a total dweeb or psychopath, you will often be passed over in favor of a slightly less qualified but socially competent person. Ditto if your goal is a date.

It's worth considering your target itself as your opponent, as well. In this case the hiring agent is the opposing general. How does that change the way you think about things?
 
3. With whom lie the advantages of Heaven and Earth?

If you apply for a job at a ski resort in May, the advantage lies with the enemy. Apply in the Fall, and you've got a much better shot.  

4. On which side is discipline most enforced?

5. Which side is stronger?

6. On which side are officers and men more highly trained?

7. In which army is there greater constancy both in reward and punishment?




All of these come back to what we talked about yesterday, method and discipline. 

It's worth taking time and thinking about how to apply Sun Tzu's questions to any particular goal. What does training mean when your goal is making dinner for your wife and kids? What sort of discipline is necessary if your goal is the completion of a novel or the cleaning of your basement? How can reward and punishment be used in a personal context, if your goal is to train for a marathon or a boxing match?
Sun Tzu's 5th constant factor is Method and Disicipline:

By method and discipline are to be understood the marshalling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the gradations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and the control of military expenditure.

As always, we have to remember that most of us aren't fighting a war or applying this guide to warfighting. Method and Discipline are, of course, critical to any undertaking. To consider a few examples:

If your goal is to get a job, then you will need to set aside time every day to research job opportunities, call companies, and send out resumes. You will do best-- I think most of us know this-- if you treat your job search as a job in itself, and show up to your computer at 8:00, dressed for work. 

If your goal is attainment in any sort of art, or craft, or for that matter any sport or skill of any other kind, you will need to set aside time to practice every day. We talked about writing a few posts back. For some reason, writers or would-be writers would bend over backwards in order to find excuses not to write. You've heard of writer's block. Have you ever heard of baker's block, runner's block, boxer's block or hunter's block? It's a good thing there's no construction worker's block, or no work would ever get done. If legislator's block exists, I've never heard of it; more's the pity. In any case, the point is this: If you want to attain anything, you have to work for it. 

The reverse is also true. Whatever you are will be the sum total of whatever you do with your time. Nothing more, and nothing less.



Sun Tzu's next category is the General. He writes,


The General stands for the virtues of Wisdom, Sincerity, Benevolence, Courage and Strictness
 

In traditional cultures East and West, ethics consist of the practice of the virtues. The Catholic philosopher Alistair MacIntyre has discussed this issue at length, especially in his book "After Virtue," which is available for free online (legitimately, as far as I know). In short, the word "ethics" itself refers, not to a series of moral harangues, but to habits of behavior. Virtues, meanwhile are excellences in one area or another.

In Chinese culture, the traditional Confucian virtues are: Benevolence; Righteousness; Propriety; Wisdom; and Sincerity.* In a military context, Sun Tzu has exchanged Courage and Strictness for Propriety and Sincerity. The 4 cardinal virtues of the ancient Greeks were Wisdom, Justice, Temperance and Courage. Christianity kept these four, and added Faith, Hope, and Charity.

The point for us is that practicing any of these sets of virtues will lead to the production of a particular type of character. 

Refer back to the first of Sun Tzu's 5 factors, the Tao or "Moral Law". We defined this as both goal-setting and as alignment with one's higher values and spiritual beliefs. The practice of the virtues is directly tied to this. We need both a general set of virtues to practice from one day to the next, and a specific set for our particular goal. Who do you want to be, and what do you want to achieve?

Persistence, Honesty, and Industriousness are virtues which will help you to get any job; if you are looking for a job with a bank, the virtues of Accounting and Professionalism will also be necessary. Charm, Wit, Confidence and Basic Hygiene are virtues to practice if you want to get a date; you'll need to add Fidelity, Courage, Endurance, Maturity and Industriousness if you also want to get married.

The practice of a specific set of virtues-- the Christian, the Confucian, the Greek-- will produce, in you, a character that is inclined toward virtue in general, which will make other virtues easier to pick up. It will also help to align your soul with the spiritual tradition you're working in, which will open you more to the aid of the powers of that tradition, incarnate or otherwise. 



*The actual Chinese terms are not easily rendered into English. There is a useful discussion here

Profile

readoldthings

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 17 18192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 4th, 2026 10:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios