The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 12, Verses 33-37 reads:
 

33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.
 

34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
 

35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.
 

36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
 

37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.


Re-Tread

Notice that I'm repeating some of the verses from last time; that's because these selections together form one coherent thought. In many Bibles they are grouped together.

It's worth noting that the original text is divided neither into chapter, nor verse; this came much later, and is seen as a serious problem by some. Why? Well, when was the last time you heard someone quote a Bible passage-- those in this particular chapter are very commonly used for this purpose-- without any context, in order to prove a point? It's much easier when your Bible itself is divided into little sections which can be pulled out and re-arranged in more or less any order you like.

Karma

That said, what are we really being taught in this section? The lesson is not, I believe, that God is a kind of intergalactic Stalinist, who sends his angelic goons to write down everything you say so that he can use it against you later on. This is the lesson that I picked up in my Catholic childhood, and which led me to run as far away from Christianity as I could for many years.

No, what I believe Jesus is teaching is very simple: All of your actions have consequences. And that includes your words, which arise from your thoughts. We have already discussed the way that mental events are as real as events in the material world. Jesus reiterates that point here, and also points out that the mental or psychic world exists in a causal relationship to the material world. Purify your heart and good words will flow from it. Make the tree of your soul good and pure, and the fruit of your actions will be good and pure. No, God isn't going to literally sit you down and say, "You called your sister a brat when you were 12, and you stole a Snickers bar from the 7-11 when you were 16, and you've spent the last 20 years staring at the backside of every woman that walks past you, so I'm just going to go ahead and set you on fire until forever now."

What really happens is simply this: You will eat the fruit of your own tree.

Click here to support this blog.

The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 12, Verses 31-35 reads: 
 
31 Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.
 
32 And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.
 
33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit.
 
34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.
 
35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

It Shall Not Be Forgiven

Here we encounter the hardest and the darkest words to be encountered anywhere in the Scripture. Jesus tells us that there are sins-- or, rather, one sin-- which cannot be forgiven, either in this world, or in the next world.

At least, that's what he appears to be saying. The word translated as world is "aoni," which actually means "age." Of course, the English word "world" originally refers also to an age, and has the connotation of both a duration of time and a human culture. We will go wrong if we understand Jesus to be using the word "aoni" to mean the same thing we do when we say "planet." 

That said, He is certainly telling us that a particular sin will either never be forgiven, or not forgiven until long ages have passed. What is that sin?

Blasphemy Against the Holy Ghost


On the surface, we are simply told that anyone who speaks ill of Jesus (the words used mean "speak against") will be forgiven, but no one who says anything bad about the Holy Ghost will be forgiven. Now, this is another case where if we take the surface meaning literally, we end up with a cosmic absurdity. It simply cannot be the case that if someone says "That Jesus guy sure is a big stupid jerk" he'll be forgiven, but if he then says "And the Holy Ghost is a big jerk too!" he goes to Hell forever. Not if we also want to have a God with a level of maturity exceeding that of the average 10 year old, anyway!

Here-- you saw this coming, didn't you?-- I'd like to turn to Plato for a bit of guidance. In both the Republic and the Phaedo, Plato suggests that there are some among the dead who are not permitted to return to the Earth, but must remain in the Underworld forever. 

Discussing the fate of the Dead in the Phaedo, Plato writes:


...when the Dead arrive at the place to which the genius of each severally guides them, first of all, they have sentence passed upon them, as they have lived well and piously or not. And those who appear to have lived neither well nor ill, go to the river Acheron, and embarking in any vessels which they may find, are carried in them to the lake, and there they dwell and are purified of their evil deeds, and having suffered the penalty of the wrongs which they have done to others, they are absolved, and receive the rewards of their good deeds, each of them according to his deserts. But those who appear to be incurable by reason of the greatness of their crimes—who have committed many and terrible deeds of sacrilege, murders foul and violent, or the like—such are hurled into Tartarus which is their suitable destiny, and they never come out.
 
Note the two crimes which he specifies as condemning a soul permanently. Put simply, they are massacres and desecrations of holy places. 

The punishment for souls who commit such crimes is to be hurled into Tartarus, forever. Tartarus, note, is not the same as the kingdom of Hades, which is the proper abode of the Dead. In pagan Greek religious thought, Tartarus is a dark realm in which the Giants and titans that rebelled against the Gods are imprisoned. In the Iliad Homer tells us that it lies "far, far away, where is the deepest gulf beneath the earth, the gates whereof are of iron and the threshold of bronze, as far beneath Hades as Heaven is above Earth." This is where the souls of those beings that have rebelled against the divine order of the Cosmos are imprisoned. Bear that in mind. 

The Lemurian Deviation

Now let's take another detour, into one of the weirder and more interesting theories to come out of the Occult schools of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Yes, I'm going to talk about the Lemurian Deviation. According to this theory, at one time in the dim past a human civilization existed on a continent called Lemuria, now sunk beneath the Pacific Ocean. Now, this civilization may have been technologically primitive-- or not, we don't know-- but they were magically quite advanced, a fact which proved their undoing. At some point, the magicians of this civilization discovered what may, to them, appeared to have been a source of power in the form of beings hidden away from our universe. Chances are, these beings lied and claimed to be very powerful; such is their nature. In any case, the Lemurian magicians broke into the prison and let its inhabitants loose. Of course, the result was not more magical power, but the destruction of their civilization. The oceans rose, the landmass on which they dwelt sunk beneath the waves, and-- what is far worse-- demons gained access to human consciousness.

Why do I think this relates to the unforgivable crimes described in Matthew 12 and in the Phaedo?

Two Forms of Evil

If you pay attention, you'll notice that human beings are capable of two kinds of evil. Even our worst crime-- that is, murder-- comes in two different forms. There are some murders which are sudden outbursts, crimes of passion-- a street fight goes wrong, a man finds his wife in bed with another man, and so on. These are evil deeds, and Plato is clear that those who commit them are punished in the next world. But they can be forgiven after a time.

Those again who have committed crimes, which, although great, are not irremediable—who in a moment of anger, for example, have done violence to a father or a mother, and have repented for the remainder of their lives, or, who have taken the life of another under the like extenuating circumstances—these are plunged into Tartarus, the pains of which they are compelled to undergo for a year, but at the end of the year the wave casts them forth—mere homicides by way of Cocytus, parricides and matricides by Pyriphlegethon—and they are borne to the Acherusian lake, and there they lift up their voices and call upon the victims whom they have slain or wronged, to have pity on them, and to be kind to them, and let them come out into the lake. And if they prevail, then they come forth and cease from their troubles; but if not, they are carried back again into Tartarus and from thence into the rivers unceasingly, until they obtain mercy from those whom they have wronged: for that is the sentence inflicted upon them by their judges.
 
I personally find it both very interesting and very intellectually satisfying-- whether or not it is literally true-- that it is their victims' forgiveness that a murderer must obtain in order to be free of punishment in the next world. In any case, the thing about these sorts of crimes is that, whatever else we can say about them, we can understand them

Certain crimes we cannot understand.

I'm not going to ennumerate them here. Frankly, these topics creep me out, and in order to describe them to you I'd have to read about them, which I greatly prefer not to. Let us, for now, suggest a difference between murders that fall under the heading "crime of passion" and those that fall under the heading "serial killer"; and between great slaughters which are necessary in order to enter into a war justifiably entered into and the sort of horrific massacres of innocents which characterized 20th century regimes like those of the Bolsheviks or Khmer Rouge.

It's my view that the first sort of evil is natural to human beings and the human experience -- We make foolish decisions by letting ourselves succumb to wrath or lust or jealousy, passions we share with the other animals. The purpose of this stage of our journey is to overcome such things, and so it is natural that they are still with us. The second sort of evil is not natural; it is worse than animal, and it only became possible when we made contact with the demonic plane.

In the case of the first sort of evil, one can imagine a soul, suitably purified, able to re-join the ordinary order of the Cosmos. This, I believe, is the meaning of Jesus's blasphemy against the Son of Man. 

In the other case, the soul has quite clearly aligned itself with those beings with whom we were never meant to have contact; the demons, the Giants, call them what you will. It is no longer fit for any association with ordinary existence, and must be locked away in Tartarus through the ending of this Age and the Age to come, for the safety of all Creation. What becomes of it in the fulness of time is a mystery. 

The Nature of the Holy Ghost

Finally, it's worth considering what it says about the nature of the Holy Ghost. If I'm right, then the Holy Ghost literally is the divine order of creation, the Life of the Cosmos itself. Or at least, this is one of the images under which we can comprehend the Holy Ghost-- His true nature, as experienced by Himself and by the Son and the Father, is another mystery.


The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 12, Verses 22-30 reads:

22 Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw.
 
23 And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David?
 
24 But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.
 
25 And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:
 
26 And if Satan cast out Satan, he is divided against himself; how shall then his kingdom stand?
 
27 And if I by Beelzebub cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? therefore they shall be your judges.
 
28 But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.
 
29 Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house, and spoil his goods, except he first bind the strong man? and then he will spoil his house. 

30 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad.

A Time of Devils

This passage concerns exorcism, so it's worth taking a moment to make an observation: In Jesus's time, exorcism was extremely common, and evil spirits seemed to be everywhere. It's popular in contemporary thinking to view the triumph of Christianity over the pagan religions of the late Classical period-- and, later, over other pagan religions through the Middle Ages-- as simply an act of violence, or cultural imperialism, or genocide. And to be fair, there was a fair bit of that. But the truth is that one of the single most important reasons for Christianity's success was its effectiveness as a system of practical magic and spirituality. And in a time like that of late Classical antiquity-- that is to say, a time burdened by demons-- that very much meant its effectiveness at performing exorcisms.  

Now, that said, there is another issue that this section immediately raises:

Can Satan Cast Out Satan?

Here are our old friends the Pharisees again. They see Jesus healing the people, which they cannot or will not do; they see him cast out demons, which they are unable or unwilling to do. And what is their claim? It is by the power of the Devil Himself that he casts the demons out!

Jesus very quickly and very characteristically tears apart this bit of idiocy. He gives us a parable, an image on which to think, which contains a straightforward bit of practical wisdom. 

You see, it is possible to know whether he is casting out demons by the power of the Devil. You don't have to guess or wonder; you can put it to the test, and the test is this:

Is the soul healed?

If so, it is not and cannot be the work of evil spirits. God is One; God is Absolute Unity. The coming of the Kingdom of God is the healing of division, especially that division within the soul that is caused by the Devil-- his name, diabolos, literally means the divider

Now, the implications of this should be obvious, though many Christians have gone out of their way to avoid noticing them for the past, oh, one thousand nine-hundred eighty-nine years or so. 

God Heals

Any spiritual path which heals the soul and brings it toward unity with the Divine, regardless of the particular Names and Images by which it invokes the Divine, necessarily and by definition is Divine and is the work of God. It's not that names and images don't matter-- they do matter, a great deal. But it is the case that whether a particular spiritual path is the work of God or the Devil is very easy to determine. Simply look at the behavior of those who follow it. If they act like they are possessed by devils, it is the work of the Devil; if they act like saints, it is the work of God; if a particular path heals the souls of those who are afflicted by demons, then it is and can only be the work of God.

And this is absolutely critical for our own time, because we, like Jesus himself, live in a time and a place in which the demonic is rampant. Here are two pieces of evidence for that claim. First, the number of drug and alcohol related deaths in the United States per year is between 180,000 and 250,000. Addiction has a physical aspect, but its cause is spiritual in nature, as anyone who has ever worked with recovering addicts can tell you The cure for addiction is a life dedicated to an appropriate spiritual practice, which is one of the ways you can tell it is a spiritual illness, because spiritual solutions don't typically help purely physical problems; it's far easier to pray your way out of alcoholism than colon cancer (though the latter does happen, of course). 

The second piece of evidence is simply that exorcisms and requests for exorcisms are at record highs.  

And, what is more, we also live in a time and place where our traditional religions-- while still very effective for many, have also failed many, and become actively harmful. Please don't misunderstand: I write and share the traditional practices of Roman Catholicism, my birth religion, because I believe in and have seen their power and their efficacy, and I want to get them into the hands of as many people as possible. But there are people out there, good people, who simply cannot read the posts I do on Christian magical practice or the Bible itself. It's not because they consciously reject God-- it's because they've suffered such severe abuse by clergy or zealous parents or others acting in the name of the Church and of Jesus that even to encounter these words produces PTSD symptoms. 

And this sort of thing isn't new, either. 

The Fall of the Gods

Publius Ovidius Naso-- known today as Ovid in English speaking countries-- was a contemporary of Jesus who died while the latter was a teenager. Ovid is today remembered as one of the great poets of Roman antiquity, and justly so. His greatest and most ambitious work is the Metamorphoses, which re-tells a great many Classical myths in what was then the contemporary style.

Here's the thing about the Metamorphoses which interests me right now: In it, the Gods appear as absolute monsters. If you read earlier works of mythology, like the works of Homer or Hesiod, or the Homeric hymns or the Orphic hymns, the Gods can be very difficult, to be sure; they're sometimes petty, sometimes jealous, sometimes tyrannical. But there is always a sense of majesty and grandeur that accompanies their actions, and always a sense-- this is critical-- that what seems capricious or arbitrary to mortals is driven by a higher moral law. That higher law is sometimes harsh, by our standards; it can sometimes be understood only by a great effort of the mind, and sometimes not at all. The fact that it can be hard to understand the goodness of the Gods is one of the reasons that Plato suggested in the Republic that the traditional poets, with their episodes of Divine cruelty or deception, should not be read at all, except in very special, ritualized circumstances. But the goodness was there, even when hard to see.

Not so in Ovid. In the Metamorphoses, the Gods are spiteful, petty, jealous horrors. In such a situation, it is hard to imagine why anyone would want to worship the Gods, and it is very easy to see how people would turn en masse to a system which offered them liberation from the spiritual tyranny to which they were subjected. 

Can we not see the same pattern in our own time? Isn't it very easy for us now to look at great Mysteries like the Fall from Paradise or Noah's Flood or the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and simply see the petty cruelty of a cosmic tyrant? How easy is it for us to look at the episodes of seeming cruelty in the Bible, set them alongside the behavior of the contemporary Church, and see the same kind of spiritual tyranny that people like Ovid lived under? Are we not awaiting the coming of a new savior, who will be to us as Jesus was to the pagan world? I think so. But it is my hope that the best in Christianity will survive, and survived in a more intact fashion than ancient Paganism did. That is a major part of the reason that I'm doing this work here. 

Today, a brief passage from The Gospel of Matthew, and a brief comment. The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 12, verses 15-21 reads: 

15 But when Jesus knew it, he withdrew himself from thence: and great multitudes followed him, and he healed them all;
 
16 And charged them that they should not make him known:
 
17 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,
 
18 Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.
 
19 He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.
 
20 A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.
 
21 And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.
 
Prophecy

Matthew is connecting the Old and New Testaments, and presenting Christ as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy. The question, of course, is whether he is right to do so. Modern Biblical "scholars" tend to say No-- they read each Gospel as simply presenting the agenda of its particular author. Matthew is trying to convert Jews, Luke is making a political argument, John is arguing at once against the Jews and against proto-Gnostic followers of Thomas, and so on. 

Of course, the orthodox position is that the incidents wherein Jesus fulfills Old Testament prophecy are exactly what they claim to be. When I was much younger, a Christian evangelist presented this to me as a reason I ought to attend his church. I thought it was nonsense. "So the Bible is right because the Bible said so?" I scoffed as only a 20 year old can scoff and departed the scene. But of course what we call "the Bible" is not a book but a collection of books, collected precisely because of their relationship to one another. 

Now, of course, the perspective I've been using in these commentaries is neither the false skepticism of the modern "critic" nor the naive acceptance of the orthodox believer. But it is far closer to the latter than the former, and I'm inclined to take Matthew at his word here. If it looked like Jesus was fulfilling a prophecy, that's very likely because he was fulfilling a prophecy, and the Gospel authors recorded it as such for the obvious reason.  

Fulfilled Prophecies

I want to say two more things on this topic.

The first is that in a fulfilled prophecy we have one of the best tests of religious truth you can find. The fulfilled prophecy is the religious equivalent of the accurate prediction which proves the scientific hypothesis. 

On June 17, 1917, the Virgin Mary gave the following message to three children at Fatima, in Portugal:

I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart. If people attend to my requests, Russia will be converted and the world will have peace.

In a later appearance that July she was more specific:

God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace. The [First World] war is going to end; if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the pontificate of Pius XI. When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that He is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart.... If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace. If not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, and various nations will be annihilated. In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world
 
Now the consecration of Russia took place in 1984, as part of a consecration of the entire world. A miracle promptly followed. Within five years, the Warsaw Pact began to fall apart. By 1991 the Communist Party had fallen in Russia, the Soviet Union was dissolved, and the Russian Church began a resurgence which continues to this day. 

In another world, this would be sufficient proof of the power of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. And also of the fact that the schism that divides the Russian and the Roman Churches means little or nothing in Heaven. Humans being humans, neither of these is an acceptable option, and so the most astonishing spiritual event of the 20th century goes largely ignored. 

Two thousand years ago, the famous Roman statesman Cicero presented a dialog about the existence of the gods in his work, De Natura Deorum (On the Nature of the Gods). Part of it runs as as follows:

The augur's office is one of high dignity; surely the soothsayer's art also is divinely inspired. Is not one who considers these and countless similar facts compelled to admit that the gods exist? If there be persons who interpret the will of certain beings, it follows that those beings must themselves exist; but there are persons who interpret the will of the gods; therefore we must admit that the gods exist. But perhaps it may be argued that not all prophecies come true. Nor do all sick persons get well, but that does not prove that there is no art of medicine. 
 
Nothing is really new, and humanity runs in the same circles over and over again.
 The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 12, Verses 1-14 reads: 
 
 
1 At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and his disciples were an hungred, and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat.
 
2 But when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto him, Behold, thy disciples do that which is not lawful to do upon the sabbath day.
 
3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;
 
4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?
 
5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?
 
6 But I say unto you, That in this place is one greater than the temple.
 
7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.
 
8 For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day.
 
9 And when he was departed thence, he went into their synagogue:
 
10 And, behold, there was a man which had his hand withered. And they asked him, saying, Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath days? that they might accuse him.
 
11 And he said unto them, What man shall there be among you, that shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and lift it out?
 
12 How much then is a man better than a sheep? Wherefore it is lawful to do well on the sabbath days.
 
13 Then saith he to the man, Stretch forth thine hand. And he stretched it forth; and it was restored whole, like as the other.
 
14 Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him.

 


The Machine Stopped, But No One Noticed

Imagine a town built around a nuclear power plant. Every household has at least one family member employed at the plant. At work, the employees wear personal protective equipment: hard hats, safety goggles, gloves, steel-toed boots. Over time, the culture of this community becomes thoroughly built around the power plant-- weddings, birthdays, even funerals, all take place at the plant. Everyone wants to work at the nuclear plant, and so even those who don't work at the plant go about in hardhats and safety goggles and so on.  

After a while, the plant itself ceases to function. Funny enough, though, no one realizes this. After long centuries, the cultural activities centered around the plant have become the point. Engineers go to work and oversee machines that no longer function. Welders and machinists repair pipes through which nothing passes. Reactor operators press buttons in prescribed sequences handed down from long ago, totally unaware that nothing at all is happening. And everyone dresses in hardhats and safety gloves and goggles and steel-toed boots, despite the lack of anything very much to be protected from. Indeed, the dress code is enforced all the more rigidly, now that it is an end unto itself, rather than a means. 

This is what superstition is: the continued use of spiritual practice-- or, far more commonly, fragments of spiritual practices-- whose meaning and purpose is no longer understood. Very often, the practices are in fact useless, because the Power which animated them has departed. 

In Jesus's time, many of the practices of the Jews have degenerated into superstition. Moreover, it's quite likely that the Power of YHVH had indeed departed Jerusalem, as demonstrated by the temple's destruction just a few decades later. 

The Man Came Around

Let's go back to the defunct nuclear power plant.

Suppose that, one day, a man turns up who claims to be the plant's owner. Along with a trusted crew of engineers and workmen, he manages to restore power here and there and get parts of the plant up and working again. 

He quickly becomes quite popular. One day, he and his engineers are sitting around the plant's cafeteria, eating lunch. Because they're in the cafeteria, they have their gloves and hardhats off, and they don't bother with goggles. 

The Board of Safety that runs the plant are upset. They're used to screaming at people to put their hat and gloves on, even if they're at lunch, or in the bathroom, or outside smoking a cigarette. And here's this jerk that claims to be the plant owner, sitting around eating a sandwich with his bare hands! When they ask him just what he thinks he's up to, he calmly replies that gloves were made for man, and not man for gloves, and in any case this is his plant and he'll do whatever he darn well pleases. 

The Board of Safety are not pleased.

The Trouble With Abraham

If I didn't have a deep and abiding love for the Christian religion, I wouldn't be writing these posts. That much should be obvious. That said, Christianity has a problem, and it's one that it shares with the other Abrahamic faiths, for the most part. To understand that problem, let's go back to the nuclear power plant. 

Suppose that when the plant was built, the Board of Safety demanded that the town use it as its only source of energy. When some people refused, the employees went out and destroyed every coal-fired power plant, every hydroelectric plant, every windmill and solar panel they could get their hands on. After that, the Board of Safety insisted that nuclear was the only possible source of energy, that no other energy source existed, and that any claims by anyone to have produced energy from any source other than nuclear was a lie. Several other nuclear plants were built, but after a few centuries, rivalries grew up between the different Board of Safety. So that now, each Board of Safety insists not only that nuclear is the only possible source of energy, but that its own plant is the only possible source of nuclear energy. Other nuclear plants are schismatic frauds, which only seem to produce energy to the foolish or malicious. 

In such a situation, it would become impossible to determine whether a plant was working or not, because it could no longer be tested. If Plant B seemed to be producing enough energy that people in the surrounding territory could turn the lights on in their homes, what of it? We already know that Plant B is a schismatic power plant, and Plant A is the only true nuclear power plant. So the idea that nuclear power allows people to turn lights on is merely a superstition. In fact, it's probably pure paganism, since those wicked people who make use of coal-fired power plants make similar claims. No, the proper way to judge a nuclear power plant is whether it adheres to the same Manual of Safety Procedures yours does-- or whether it's obedient to your Board of Safety-- anything else is mere superstition. 

The Circle is Unbroken

Much of CHristianity, then, is in a similar state to the Judaism of Jesus's day, with the added difficulty that many churches not only cannot judge the efficacy of their practices, they have in fact prohibited themselves from doing so! Indeed, much of Christianity largely consists of people going to the defunct nuclear power plant every Sunday to share coffee and sandwiches in the old cafeteria. 

This is why I say that we can always judge the conditions of our own souls, as the soul is the sum total of our thoughts, emotions, and actions. If we fail to do so, we wind up like Pharisees, performing actions we don't understand for reasons we've never known, or else we wind up treating spiritual practices as if they didn't matter at all. 
 


Profile

readoldthings

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 17 18192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 17th, 2025 07:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios