The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 7, Verses 3-5 reads:

3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?

5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
 
This is another one of my favorite verses. It's also one that has gotten an enormous amount of attention over the years and the centuries, and I don't want to repeat things that you can hear anywhere else. 

So what can we say on this subject that is new?

The Eye of the Soul

As we've discussed here before, the highest part or faculty of the soul is called the nous or mind. Nous is akin to an eye which opens onto the spiritual world, directly beholding God and the spiritual reality. Part of our dilemma here on Earth is that our nous is more or less closed, and the work of spiritual practice is the work of opening it and teaching it to see clearly.

In his commentaries on Plato's Timaeus, Proclus discusses the various faculties of the nous. Nous proper is the direct apprehension of divine realities we've just discussed. Below this is dianoia, or discursive reasoning, and below this, doxa or opinion. 

Now it follows that lower things flow from higher things. If, therefore, our nous at its highest is dark or clouded, our reasoning will be flawed, and our opinions will be false. If we then attempt to help others, seeing that their own reasoning and opinions are false, we will do nothing but substitute our own false judgments and misapprehensions for theirs. Hypocrites indeed. 

The Mind Is In The Heart

In the West, a proper understanding of the nous disappeared some time after the Renaissance, when even Western religion sank into rationalism-- or, to say it another way, "dianoia-ism," the elevation of a lower faculty and forgetting or refusal of the higher. 



More recently, of course, many of us have collapsed into mere "doxa-ism," opinion-ism, which is what a vapid slogan like "Follow the Science" means and why people are so brutishly aggressive in the defense of their opinions.

The Christian East preserved the older understanding of the nous. And you will find that, when Orthodox thinkers talk about the nous, they don't locate it in the brain, even though it is mind. The brain is where dianoia takes place. They locate it, rather, in the heart. And so we see that it isn't our heads that we must clear, but our hearts; it is our hearts, rather than our minds, that we change in order to attain the kingdom of heaven that is within us. Everything flows from there.

The Conditioned Response

Let's take a brief trip East.

In Chinese Taoism the central principle of existence is the duality between Yin and Yang. Yin and Yang are sometimes misunderstood in the West, where earlier Christian translators took them for good and evil and assumed that Taoism was a kind of pantheism in which God was both good and bad at once. This is not correct. Yang is hard, masculine, mobile, hot, light, and active; Yin is flexible, feminine, fixed, cold, dark, and passive.  Yin and Yang are both "good," in that both are necessary for existence: lacking yang, you would be stuck to the floor,; lacking yin, your molecules would fly apart! "evil," which is the same as disease or imbalance, arises when either one goes to excess. Thus a person, a house, a family, or a society may suffer from either yang excess, which leads to chaos, conflict, and instability, or yin excess, which leads to weakness, sluggishness and stagnation.

Now, one of the most common representations of yin and yang is the pair of Earth and Heaven.

As in the system of thought we are discussing, Heaven and Earth don't refer-- or don't exclusively refer-- to the actual physical Heaven and Earth.

Rather, "Earth" in this case means ordinary, everyday experience; "Heaven" means the higher consciousness of the spiritual realm, sometimes called the Mind of Tao. In the Quanzhen (Complete Reality) school of Taoism, the work of spiritual practice begins with "repelling yin and fostering yang." Not because yin or Earth is seen as evil, but, rather, that it must be that the higher consciousness must rule over the lower. To put it in more familiar terms, the higher mind must be awakened, and the lower faculties, from dianoia on down to epithymia, must act in obedience to it. 

Thomas Cleary comments: 
 

The mind of Tao and the human mind are also associated with 'real knowledge" and "conscious knowledge." Real knowledge is held to be nondiscursive, immediate knowing, originally inherent in the human being and not the product of learning. Conscious knowledge is the everyday awareness of ordinary life, formed by training and experience. The Taoist aim is to open consciousness and thereby allow greater access to reality, bypassing mental habits, stabilizing conscious knowing by real knowledge so that it is not subject to distorting influences. This is also expressed in terms of making real knowledge conscious and conscious knowledge real.

This is from Cleary's introduction to his translation of Understanding Reality, a 19th century Taoist meditation manual which is itself a commentary on an earlier medieval document. 

Many Paths

The more I explore, the more convinced I am that there is a single spiritual truth toward which many religious and philosophical systems point. The quest for the individual soul is to find the path that is right for them, through learning and experience. Having attained what Jesus calls the Kingdom of Heaven and what the Quanzhen school calls the Mind of Tao, the divinized soul can then return to Earth to guide the rest of us along their path. 
 In The Gospel of Matthew Chapter 5, Verses 38 to 48, Jesus says:
 
38 Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
 
39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
 
40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.
 
41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
 
42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
 
43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
 
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
 
45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
 
46 For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?
 
47 And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?
 
48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

Here we come to some of Jesus's best known and most easily ignored words. 

They are not easy words, and following this path is not easy. But I believe that what Jesus is teaching here is the very highest sort of spiritual development-- and spiritual warfare. Let's illustrate that point by example.

The Magical Battle of Britain

Beginning in 1939, the English Occultist Dion Fortune led a series of magical workings designed to ensure a British victory in World War II. Her method was fairly straightforward-- she and her circle would send out a letter and a theme for meditation once a week to all the members of their organization. On Sunday, the recipient was to open the letter and study its contents, and then, at 12:15-- that is, at high noon on the Day of the Sun-- to face London and enter into meditation on the theme indicated.

At one point, Fortune received a letter urging that she and her group carry out magical attacks on German leaders. Her response is worth careful study:

Nobody and nothing is altogether evil, therefore it is never justifiable to try and destroy any person or thing by direct action, but only to open a channel whereby spiritual forces are brought to bear upon the problem. This is the meaning of Our Lord's command to leave the wheat and tares to grow together till the harvest. Hate is an evil thing in itself, whatever its provocation, and to call it righteous indignation does little to improve it.

Our work is a work of healing, and no hate must come of it. We look to see a regenerated Germany rise up in strength and greatness as well as goodwill and peace. On this great earth of ours there is room for all if they will only co-operate.

Fortune was not a pacifist and did not demand that the British lay down arms. She did insist, however, that the spiritual work to be done in aid of the war effort consist entirely in works of healing and blessing. And why?

Note her opening line: "Nothing and nobody is altogether evil." This is because-- to state the very obvious-- everything which exists is. That is, it has being. Being is derived from the One, which is the same as the Good and which we also call God. Therefore, to exist at all is to possess a kind of goodness. The work of the true initiate, then, is not to destroy things, because to destroy is, necessarily, to rebel against God. 

Healing is a very different thing. To heal literally means to make whole. Wholeness is another way of saying oneness; every whole consists of a unity of parts, and that unity is an expression of oneness and is therefore derived from the One. If Germany exists, it is because God wills that it exists, and God does not will evil. If Germany is acting evilly, then the solution is to heal Germany, not destroy it. A regenerated Germany rising up in strength and greatness is a Germany expressing Oneness, Goodness, and Godliness through a particular filter-- the filter of the German nation. 

The Magical Battle of America

I very often think of these lines with regard to the present political impasse in the United States. What would happen if partisans on either side of our divide were to say to one another, "We do not wish to destroy you, but to perfect you?" This country consists of many different subdivisions-- regional, ethnic, religious. What if we had a politics which said "Blacks, Jews, WASPs, Irish and Scots-Irish, Italians, Apaches, Germans, Mexicans and Scandinavians; New Englanders, Appalachians, New Yorkers and Pennsylvanians, High Southerners, Deep Southerners, Westerners, Mid-Westerners, Californians, Cascadians, and the Cubans of Miami; Protestants, Catholics, Jews again, Mormons, Pagans, Wizards and Radicals; Rednecks, Hippies, Yuppies, Cowboys-- each of these is a particular expression of Americanness, and America is a particular expression of Godliness. We are all in this together, like words in a sentence spoken by God. Without exception, all have sinned and fallen short and owe repentance to God and one another; all have triumphed and achieved greatness and are worthy of celebration. All have their own particular struggles, wounds of the past and besetting sins, but we can lean on one another, and all of us can lean on God. We will not force the values of Berkeley onto West Virginia or Charleston onto Minnesota, but we will instead support each in leading the life proper to it in its own proper place, so that each may achieve its own greatness."

How would that change our political discourse?

A Story

Some years ago I was living in a house with 4 or 5 roommates. We were all friends and got along well with one another. Then we had a very bad falling out, and we came to hate one another. It was so bad that I couldn't be in the house alone with them. I got off of work at 5:00, but my girlfriend, who lived with me at the time, got off at 7:00; I would wait downtown for her, so that we could go home together. 

One day I left work and I was feeling extremely angry. It was the kind of anger that doesn't go away, no matter what you do. And I tried everything-- think about something else, take deep breaths, you name it.

I wandered into a coffeeshop, thinking that a cup of chamomile tea might at least calm my nerves. I sat down with my tea, and I remembered that chamomile is a Solar herb and used in rituals of blessing and spiritual protection. That gave me an idea. 

The coffeeshop had a single-use bathroom with a door that locked, and it was relatively clean inside. So I took my tea into the bathroom, locked the door, and did the Lesser Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram. Afterward, I stood in the light, surrounded by flaming pentagrams and the four archangels, and I felt compelled, I do not know by what, to say the Lord's Prayer. At the line "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us," I stopped, and found myself repeating the line over, and over, and over. Then I finished the prayer and took up the chamomile tea. I dipped my fingers in it, and drew crosses on my forehead and on the backs of my hands. 

Then I went back to my seat and entered into meditation, resolving to meditate until the tea on my head and hands dried completely.

In meditation, I visualized each of the roommates that I was angry with, one at a time. I pictured the entire conflict as clearly as I could from their perspective. Once I had a clear sense of their perspective, I called their image to mind again and said "I understand that you can only be who you are. I am sorry for my part in our conflict, and I forgive you for yours." I then thanked them for the friendship that we had at one time, released the image, and moved onto the next person.

When I entered the coffeeshop I was so angry I was shaking. By the time I left I felt like I was floating in an ocean of golden light.

Strangely enough, when I finally got home, my roommates greeted me politely, for the first time in weeks, as though nothing was wrong.

I won't tell you we became friends again after that-- We didn't and we couldn't. But the fight was over. 

Likeness

Jesus tells us to be perfect, as our father in Heaven is perfect; this is how we become children of God. Remember that he has used this term before, in the Beatitudes. And remember that, from our perspective, things are not like one another by coincidence. If something is like another thing, it is because it is participating in the very being of the thing that it is like. By becoming like God, we ourselves become Divine. "Therefore," says Plotinus, "Let each become godlike and beautiful who wishes to see God and Beauty."



The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 5, Verses 29-37 reads:

29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

30 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.

31 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement:

32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:

34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:

35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.

36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

Strange Sayings

This section of the Sermon on the Mount contains a series of strange sayings. Many Christians, I think, like to ignore this part; others take the opportunity to pull Jesus's words out of context and take them as literally as possible. Let's see if we can't find a third way.

Two Horses, One Chariot

Jesus opens by telling us that if our eye offends us (literally, causes us scandal), then we ought to pluck it out, because it's better to go to Heaven with one eye than be tossed into Hell with two eyes. And the same goes for the hands-- it's better to go to Heaven as an amputee, than to go to Hell with two hands. 

Now the meaning of this passage is this: The eye is the organ that sees; the hand is the organ that acts. At the most fundamental level, every being consists of three parts: the capacity to act, the capacity to perceive, and mere being itself. In the Platonic literature these three at their most basic constitute the primordial triad of Being, Life, and Intellect. The latter, remember, does not mean the thinking mind, which is a lower thing, but the nous, that highest part of the soul, sometimes called the eye of the soul, which directly perceives God and spiritual realities. 

Now Heaven and Hell, as we have said, do not refer to after-death states, but to the totality of nonphysical reality that the soul experiences right now, and will continue to perceive once the material body is cast aside at death. Heaven is the reality of God and the celestial hierarchy, of Unity and Love, and of the creative powers which shape the cosmos. Hell is enslavement to the body's passions, to wrath and anger, and to everything which separates and isolates us; in the modern world, the term "addiction" broadly applied perfectly describes the state of the soul in Hell. 

With that in mind, let's recall the image of the soul that we are given in Plato's Phaedrus:

Of the nature of the soul, though her true form be ever a theme of large and more than mortal discourse, let me speak briefly, and in a figure. And let the figure be composite-a pair of winged horses and a charioteer. Now the winged horses and the charioteers of the gods are all of them noble and of noble descent, but those of other races are mixed; the human charioteer drives his in a pair; and one of them is noble and of noble breed, and the other is ignoble and of ignoble breed; and the driving of them of necessity gives a great deal of trouble to him.

The soul's capacity for perception can be turned toward the things of Heaven, or the things of Hell; the soul's capacity for action can be turned toward the things of Heaven or the things of Hell. Reality is fractal; both the Eye and the Hand has its light horse and its dark horse. 

Remember, too, that Jesus in the Beatitudes has taught us to dwell in Heaven even as we sojourn on the Earth. Here he is giving us a reminder of this power, using the powerful imagery of amputation to burn it into our minds. 

And What of Divorce? 

From a magical perspective, marriage is not just a contract, and sexual union is not just a movement of bodies. Remember the discussion of occult anatomy from the last post. The total human person exists on the physical level of material bodies; the etheric level of vital energies; the astral level of passion, emotion, imagination and thought; and, ultimately, the intellectual level of noetic perception and the True Will and the spiritual level of pure being. 

I think Jesus is also being practical here, following on his discussion of the practical effects of directing emotionally-charged thoughts at other people. Have you ever noticed that, over time, married people start to look like one another? And if you're married, you've probably had the experience of knowing what your partner is thinking or feeling, or if they're trying to get in touch with you, regardless of where they are. My wife and I frequently speak entire sentences simultaneously. The various features of married life, including sex, emotional love, and sharing a sleeping space, all serve to unite the married couple at the etheric and astral levels. Even fighting and arguing has this effect. The two members of a married couple literally cease to be separate bodies and, especially at the energetic levels, function as two nodes of a single unit. Simply removing yourself from the physical presence of the other partner doesn't destroy this bond-- though it can be destroyed. But if you have sex with a married person, you are also mingling your energies with their partner, as unpleasant as it might sound. And that's the real definition of adultery-- by committing adultery you are, in effect, raping the non-adulterous partner, by forcibly and secretly mingling their energies with someone else's.

This is also why it's not a good idea to date when you're "on the rebound"-- what this literally means is that your previous partner's astral and, probably, etheric energy is still part of your aura. It might feel good to replace their physical body with someone else's, but its energetic effects are similar to adultery. This isn't a moral prescription. It's just the way things are-- especially for the Initiate who has begun to awaken to awareness of realities above the merely physical. It's also why hookup culture, casual sex, and heartbreak generally are so destructive. And yes, these things are so common today as to be basically universal. I wonder if the gods have allowed us to reach this state of affairs just so we can remember how destructive it is, and return to a better way.

Remember that moral adjurations are descriptions of an ideal state and need to be understood on a mythic level. Divorce is an evil, but occasionally a necessary evil. In the ideal world, it would never happen; in this world, we sometimes have to make the least-worst choice.

Politics

Jesus is also carrying out a mild bit of social reform here, by protecting women from frivolous divorce. This is not at all trivial in a time when a woman is dependent on her husband to a degree that's hard to imagine today. Notice the way that he goes about his reforms: He doesn't destroy the old system, and he doesn't burn society to the ground to start over again from scratch. Instead, he preserves the existing order of things, but makes one small but very consequential change.

This is not a political blog and it's never going to be but I'd like to suggest that Jesus's method here is worth emulating. It's easy to use our imagination to come up with a perfect society and to use our reason to justify to ourselves why it ought to exist. In practice, human reason is far more limited than we realize, and the material world cannot be made to conform to the visions of our imagination. Nature defeats us. The existing order of things, as awful as it may be, has one advantage over every imagined utopia-- it exists. We know that it works, even if it works badly, by the mere fact that it exists. And, existing, it necessarily possesses a kind of life. If we wish to change it, then, we ought to treat it as a living thing. And how do living things change? Gradually, step by step, an increment at a time. To attempt to reform society by "revolution," in which society is effectively destroyed and replaced by an invention, is equivalent to attempting to perform medicine by killing your patient and replacing him with a robot.  

Why Not Swear?

Finally, Jesus tells us not to swear oaths. 

This passage is confusing unless one realizes the following-- in the ancient world, to "swear an oath" meant to invoke the god named Oath and ask him to come down and witness your promise and then to torment you if you break it. Hesiod says the following about Oath's genesis in the Theogony:

But abhorred Strife bare painful Toil and Forgetfulness and Famine and tearful Sorrows, Fightings also, Battles, Murders, Manslaughters, Quarrels, Lying Words, Disputes, Lawlessness and Ruin, all of one nature, and Oath who most troubles men upon earth when anyone wilfully swears a false oath.
 
Yes, all of the beings named are actual gods. One thing you realize reading ancient literature is that their world was, from a modern perspective, somehow inside-out. Natural phenomena are living beings and are gods-- and so are those social phenomena, and mental and emotional phenomena that we encounter but believe to be internal to ourselves. And so Oath is a god, one who forces us to keep our covenants; and notice that he is the son of Strife, and ultimately in the lineage of Night. Even the gods afollowed this procedure-- rather than Oath, the spirit of the River Styx held the gods to their covenants, and if they broke them, it effectively placed them in prison for a time. 

So deathless Styx came first to Olympus with her children through the wit of her dear father. And Zeus honoured her, and gave her very great gifts, for her he appointed to be the great oath of the gods, and her children to live with him always.

By letting our Yes mean Yes, and our No, mean No, without the need to summon divine witness, we effectively become divine ourselves. Or, to say it another way, one who has followed the path of the Beatitudes and who now dwells at once in both worlds only needs to say Yes or No; his will is as adamant and his word is as the very gods-- or more.



The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 5, Verses 20 through 28 reads as follows:

 
20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

21 Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:
 

22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
 

23 Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
 

24 Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.
 

25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.
 

26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
 

27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
 

28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
 
 
 
 
Pharisees and Sadducees

Unless we are more righteous than the Pharisees and Sadducees, we shall not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. But who are the Pharisees and Sadducees?

Historically, these were two sects within Second Temple Judaism, the Judaism of Jesus's time. The Sadducees tended to come from the upper classes; the Chief Priest and the High Priests were Sadducees, and they had a majority in the Sanhedrin, the ruling court or parliament of Israel. The Pharisees also had power in the Sanhedrin, but came from a more modest social background; the First Century Jewish historian Josephus tells us that they were widely supported by the common people.

For our purposes, we are more concerned with the role of the Saducees and Pharisees in the myth that is the Gospel than in their historical reality. From that perspective, the important points are these: The Sadducees did not believe in an afterlife or in the existence of spirits of any kind. (Notice that they were members of the Upper Class, and had power within both the priesthood and government-- parallels to the modern world very obviously suggest themselves). The Pharisees, on the other hand, believed in the realty of the spiritual world. But they emphasized strict adherence to the rules of the Old Testament, especially the purity laws-- Later we'll find them condemning Jesus for performing miracles on the Sabbath, for example.

We can think of the Sadducees, upper-class materialists who controlled the priesthood and much of the government, as akin to today's atheist or non-religious upper class Social Justice liberals, and the Pharisees as akin to our middle-to-lower class right-wing religious fundamentalists. The parallel is not exact, but it is useful for our purposes, as we will see presently.

The Pythagorean and the Orphic

The late Platonic philosopher Proclus tells us that there are two methods of approaching theology in a symbolic manner, the Pythagorean and the Orphic:

Those who treat of divine concerns in an indicative manner, either speak symbolically and fabulously, or through images... And he who desires to signify divine concerns through symbols is Orphic, and in short, accords with those who writes fables concerning the Gods. But he who does this through images is Pythagoras. For the mathematical disciplines were invented by the Pythagoreans, in order to a reminiscence of divine concerns, at which, through these as images they endeavor to arrive. For they refer both number and figure to the Gods, according to the testimony of their historians.

In other words, the Orphics symbolize the divine through Myth, the Pythagoreans, through Math.

In the modern world, we probably aren't used to the idea that mathematics has any relationship to theology. Indeed, the two are often opposed to one another, with "Math" set alongside "Science" and the two together opposed to "Religion." From a Platonic perspective, this makes very little sense. After all, what do mathematical formulae describe, but immaterial realities which constantly shape and uphold the material world? In the physical world, no perfect right triangle exists; the perfect right triangle, whose dimensions are described exactly by the Pythagorean Theorem, exists in ideal form alone. And yet it constantly shapes the world of our experience, and knowledge of it gives us the ability to shape that world.

Myths are the same. As Sallust wrote, they are stories which "Never happened, but always are." Saturn was never a real guy who sat down with a fork and a knife and ate his children; if he had, his story would simply be a horror, and there would be nothing we could learn from it. If we understand that Saturn is Time, and his children are the seconds, minutes, hours and days of our lives, then we can understand something about our world and the way it functions.

The same is true of Christian myth. The Garden of Eden, the Fall, and Noah's Flood; the entire saga of the Old Testament; and now the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, are all, whatever else they are, myths. As works of journalism or history, they may also be more or less accurate-- or they may not be. It doesn't matter: As myths, they describe the immaterial processes which shape our lives and our souls now, regardless of what happened 2,000 years ago. 

This is very important when it comes to passages like these, in which Jesus gives particular moral imperatives. From our perspective, the important thing about the Gospels is that they are myths. When Jesus gives teachings like these, he is playing the part of The Lawgiver, a particular form of a figure common to many mythologies.

The Pharisaic, The Sudducean

Both the Pythagorean and the Orphic methods of understanding the Divine can be debased, and when they are debased, they do an enormous amount of harm. In both cases, the cause of the debasement is the same, and we can call that cause Literalization. Pythagorean formulae or Orphic stories are taken by the Literalizer as descriptions of, or prescriptions for, life in the physical world, rather than descriptions of processes in the Eternal World.

We can call the degradation of the Pythagorean Method the Sadducean Method, and degradatation of the Orphic Method the Pharisaic Method. In the Sudducean Method, beings in the material world are mistaken for numbers in the ideal world; in the Pharisaic Method, myths from the ideal world are taken as descriptions of the physical world. In both cases, the Literalizer often attempts to force the physical world to conform to the Ideal World, often with dreadful consequences.

Knowing the Pythagorean Theorem will give you the measurement of a right triangle, but you will be incorrect if you expect any particular right triangle in the physical world to be perfect; all of them are off, even if by only the tiniest bit. That mistake won't cause much harm, but there are ways that Sadducean Method, applied to human beings, can be very harmful indeed. We see this especially in the reduction of individual human beings to statistical aggregates in modern political rhetoric. Indeed, this is the essence of modern identity politics, whether of the Left Wing (Communist, "Social Justice") or right-wing (Ethnonationalist, Nazi) varieties. 

The reduction of the human being to a statistical aggregate is one of the hallmarks of modern political ideology and, indeed, of modern politics in general. Its fruit is genocide. Nor are its worst features limited to the political Left. 

The Pharisaic Method is equally destructive. The Christian tradition, as we have said, has its own body of myth, beginning with the Garden of Eden and proceeding through the life of Jesus and his apostles, and his eventual return. But its stories about the fate of the soul after death are also myths. The traditional understanding of Hell as a prison in which unrepentant sinners are tormented by fire and demons is a very useful way of understanding what happens to our psyches when we wallow in our own bad behavior and evil thoughts. As a literal description of an actual place in which a supposedly good deity tortures people in a way that would gladden the heart of Ted Bundy, it is a moral abomination, and its promulgation is a form of psychological torture. 

Keep all this in mind when Jesus discusses punishments and hellfire.

A Story About A Bible

Before we continue I want to tell a story.

This happened about 4 years ago. One night I was lying awake reading Eliphas Levi's Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic, and I came across his discussion of thoughts, and the way that our thoughts and feelings can affect others at a distance. Levi writes:

Maledictions and benedictions always have an effect, and all action, whatever it may be, whether it is inspired by love or by hate, produces effects analogous to its motive, its reach, and its direction. The emperor whose images had been mutilated, and who, as he brought his hand to his face, said: "I have not been hurt," made a false appraisal and by it diminished the merit of his clemency. What honorable man can look calmly upon the insults made to his portrait? And what if such insults, even done without our knowledge, fell upon us through their fatal influence; what if the art of enchantments was real, as the adept is not permitted to doubt, how much more would we find the words of the emperor imprudent and reckless!

There are people that one can never offend with impunity ,and if one's offense to them is fatal, then one begins to die from that point on. There are those one cannot encounter without it having an effect and whose gaze can change the direction of one's life. The basilisk who kills with its gaze is not a fable; it is a magical allegory. In general, it is bad for your health to have enemies, and one cannot brave anyone's disapproval with impunity.

As I read this, I thought about the passage in the Gospel that we're discussing today. In particular, I was thinking about Jesus's insistence that even to think lustfully about a woman is to commit adultery with her. That always seemed a little over the top to me, and, of course, in my youth it was more or less a form of torture-- if there is a 14 year old heterosexual boy that doesn't look lustfully at women, I've never heard of him, but of course the priests insisted that God was going to send us to hell for it. (There's that Pharisaic Method again, in all its glory-- and it's not like the priests didn't do any lusting themselves; you can read the Grand Jury report here.)

So if Jesus wasn't just being a jerk or control freak, what could this passage mean? Could it be that he was saying just what Levi was saying-- that our thoughts and feelings can affect others at a distance? If so, the passages about having already committed adultery with a woman you're lusting after are completely literal.

Well, anyway, I thought these things, and then I fell asleep.

The next morning I left the house to walk to work, my work being only a few blocks from my apartment in those days. As I stepped onto the street I kissed my hand and held it toward the Sun, saying a small prayer of gratitude to him for the light of the day. I continued on. After another block or so I came across a book, lying open, face down in the street. 

The book was a Bible.

I picked it up, and in rapid succession, my eyes fell upon the following two passages:

Ecclesiastes 11:7-8 Truly the light is sweet, and a pleasant thing it is for the eyes to behold the sun: 8But if a man live many years, and rejoice in them all; yet let him remember the days of darkness; for they shall be many.

and



Ecclesiastes 10:20 Curse not the king, no not in thy thought; and curse not the rich in thy bedchamber: for a bird of the air shall carry the voice, and that which hath wings shall tell the matter.
 
I can't imagine that even the most thoroughgoing Pharisaic fundamentalist could believe that the second passage refers to actual birds flying through the air and telling the king that you're mad at him. No-- King Solomon is teaching the same principle which Jesus is teaching here, and which will later be discussed in detail by people like Eliphas Levi. Our thoughts can affect people at a distance, and we must be very careful with them, lest we become murderers or adulterers, with all the consequences that entails. 

Occult Anatomy

We have bodies which are not made of matter. Contemporary occult theory, which is ultimately an elaboration of ancient Platonism (which is itself an elaboration of still older traditions), recognizes between 2 and 6 levels of existence above the physical, depending on how you divide them. We exist on all these levels, and have fully formed bodies on three of them. 

The physical body you know. Occult theory recognizes the subtle body or etheric body, which consists of the vital energies; you can find details on this in any text on Ayurveda or Traditional Chinese Medicine. Above the etheric body is the the astral body, which consists of the thoughts, emotions, and mental representations. The astral body is also what is known as the soul. 

Above the astral body is what is sometimes called the "mental sheath." This is what is called the nous in Platonic thought, and it is what Jesus and John are telling us to change, that we may dwell in the Kingdom of Heaven. Somewhat confusingly, the mental body isn't a body of thought; thought is astral. It exists at a higher level than than thought. Why is it called a "sheath," rather than a body? Because at our current stage of spiritual evolution, we don't have a fully-functioning body on this level. Saints do, though, and that's why they are able to affect change in our material world. The idea that they "pray to God for us" is mythic language; it means that, at the level of nous, which is also called Intellect or Divine Mind in the texts we've been looking at, they are always united to God, the First Cause, and it is ultimately through the First Cause that any change happens. 

Space, distance, and time exist at the material level. At the highest level, the level of the One or God, there is no space, and there is no time; this is what is meant by Eternity. Between the physical and Eternity, time and distance become less and less relevant. Our thoughts and feelings, existing at the astral level, are only affected by distance to a limited degree. Thus a strongly formulated thought, charged with passion, can affect another person. When Jesus says that you have already committed adultery with a woman by lusting after her, he isn't being metaphorical; when he tells you that anyone who is angry with his brother is already guilty of murder, he's just telling it like it is. To direct evil thoughts at others is to curse them, and curses always carry their own consequences. We can understand those consequences as imprisonment and hellfire: the soul addicted to sin becomes hardened against the outside, and trapped in the burning heat of its own negativity.

These are fundamental principles of magic and of magical ethics in particular, and this is what Jesus is teaching us here.
The Gospel of Matthew, Chapter 5, Verses 17-19 reads:

 17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
 
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
 
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

Whose Law, Which Prophets?

Jesus continues his discourse by telling us that he has not come to abolish "the Law" or "the Prophets." No-- he has come, rather, to fulfill them, and neither the law nor the prophets will be abrogated until Heaven and Earth pass away.

What does this mean?

If we take a parochial view, Jesus is only telling us to continue to obey the rules of purity and moral conduct given to the Jews in the Old Testament. These are the rules, and we've got to keep on following them until he comes back and blows up the Earth. 

Now, this reading makes next to no sense in the context of the passage itself. Why would Jesus tell us to continue to obey the Old Testament rules, and then immediately proceed to change them? But leaving that aside, there is a much more interesting way to look at this.

Let us suppose, as we have already supposed, that God is the One, the Eternal Divine Power that brings the whole world into being. Below God, there are additional entities-- we usually call them "Gods," which confuses things, but which has its uses, too-- who carry out the actual government of the universe; who bring into being, govern and manage the particular phenomena of the living world. If this is the case, God Godself can be known by all peoples, and any of the particular Gods can be the path to God. 

That doesn't mean that every particular God is good. As it turns out, many are not. Some seem to actually be evil entities in open rebellion against the divine order of the cosmos. It is also the case that there are many paths to the One God.

Many Mountains, Many Paths, One Sky



How can we know that?

By two means. The first is that, if we take spiritual experiences seriously, we have to take them seriously for everybody. For example: Porphyry tells us that through his various meditative disciplines, his teacher Plotinus was on several occasions able to rise to the presence of the Most High God. If that is so, then Platonism is a path to God, as Judaism is. Of course, Platonism's influence on Christianity is well known; even staying firmly within the bounds of orthodoxy, there quite simply is no Christianity in the forms we know it without Platonism. As some Orthodox and Anglican priests have put it, "God sent Plato to the Greeks as surely as he sent Isaiah to the Hebrews." But similar experiences-- not identical, mind, but similar-- are reported by Hermetic mystics, by yogis, Buddhists, Taoists, and followers of other spiritual paths. If all of these people are able, by different paths and different methods, to reach the proverbial top of the mountain, then there are and must be multiple paths.

The second means is simply that we can observe the changes that spiritual practices make in the lives of individuals. Remember that the soul simply is the life of the individual-- it isn't something mysterious or invisible, it's not a cloud of gas weighing 28 grams. It's the sum total of the individual's choices, habits, actions, and mental experiences. And so we never have to wonder about the condition of our souls; we can always know, by examining our thoughts, habits, reactions, choices, and how we treat others. And all it takes is the slightest familiarity with people of various religions to know that many of them save souls in the most literal sense. 

Therefore, if Jesus is what he claims to be, what his followers claim him to be-- and what I believe him to be-- he cannot simply be talking about Jewish law or particular Jewish practices. The Law is the eternal order of the cosmos itself, and the Prophets are all those who reveal that order to human beings. Abraham, Moses, Isaiah, Daniel; Pythagoras, Parmenides, Socrates, Plato, Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus, Proclus, and Hermes Trismegistos; Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, and the Yellow Emperor; and many more besides.

The Fulfillment of the Law

Jesus tells us that the Law will not be changed until all has been fulfilled.

For Saint Origen, an early church father and one of the very best, that meant that the whole of creation would eventually be gathered back to God, no matter how far they had fallen. The Creation of Humanity itself, in this view, is complete-- fulfilled-- once every human being is united to God eternally. Even the devil himself will be gathered back to God, in the end.

Of course Origen was eventually declared a heretic at the urging of the Emperor Justinian, though they had to wait until he had been dead for a century or two to do it. Such is the fate of most people who speak truths that upset the powerful. 

In terms of occult philosophy, what this means is that the current world that we live in will come to an end once all of its participants have proceeded through the long course of spiritual evolution to deification. At that point, they themselves-- we, ourselves-- will bring new worlds into being. 

Profile

readoldthings

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516 17 18192021
22232425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 02:27 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios