Daily Advice 1.05.21
Jan. 5th, 2021 07:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
More Seneca:
Maybe we can remember this, and be slower to wrath when YouTube or the television gives us the impression of a vicarious injury.
There can be no doubt that anger is aroused by the direct impression of an injury; but the question is whether it follows immediately upon the impression and springs up without assistance from the mind, or whether it is aroused only with the assent of the mind.
Our opinion is that it ventures nothing by itself, but acts only with the approval of the mind. For to form the impression of having received an injury and to long to avenge it, and then to couple together the two propositions that one ought not to have been wronged and that one ought to be avenged - this is not a mere impulse of the mind acting without our volition. The one is a single mental process, the other a complex one composed of several elements; the mind has grasped something, has become indignant, has condemned the act, and now tries to avenge it. These processes are impossible unless the mind has given assent to the impressions that moved it.
Maybe we can remember this, and be slower to wrath when YouTube or the television gives us the impression of a vicarious injury.